This from Ben Shapiro is not just wrong in a technical way. It is spectacularly wrong in a "did not even grasp the spirit of the argument" way.
Help me chisel away at the things I believe now that aren't true He/him. Both to normalize having pronouns in bio and because bigots get really triggered by it
414 followers 227 following 3,022 posts
view profile on Bluesky
This from Ben Shapiro is not just wrong in a technical way. It is spectacularly wrong in a "did not even grasp the spirit of the argument" way.
Well yeah. The computer ones are ubiquitous in that trays for you classify your fetish materials
I have recently acquired the PERFECT response to this!
These fucking morons are what is fillinf the void of the hippie anti-vaxxers now that the right has co-opted tht specific piece of idiocy
Do we usually go for half-meassures here?
Yup. About as bad as when you lose @annateresa.bsky.social
Ohh! That explains that! (I've never seen Kids in the Hall, so that's why I had no idea who that was!)
And that's one of the reasons I have such respect for you
Oh, I've DEFINITELY had several of those. INCLUDING ABOUT DEFAMATION! And "yelling fire in a crowded theatre" The difference between Rob and myself is that I welcomed the opportunity to learn!
I meant that autocorrect got you in your reply to me
Apparently this is a sin big enough to be blocked by the OP, but: who?
So sure of himself that he's never had to learn, correct and grow! And what's worse, he probably thinks that's a good thing!
If I was opining about, I don't know, evolution, and a bunch of actual working biologists - as well as people whom they seem to be cordial with - kept correcting my assertions, I would certainly pause and go do some actual research to see what fundamental things I wasn't understanding But not Rob!
Seems to be one-sided, judgning from your own skeet...
That would hold more weight if I hadn't gone and checked and saw you responding to other threads since this was posted Why do you feel compelled to lie? Do you not stop to think that maybe that should tell you something about the viability of your claims?
Can you cite to a case where it wasn't? As in, a court found someone liable for hate speech? Or do you just FEEL that's how it is?
This should be TRIVIALLY wasy for Rob to answer based on what he beleives the law to be, no?
Literally no one is defending him. We're defending reality, while you are clinging to your feelings, all MAGA-like
Man, could have saved me a lot of wrestling to get this under the character limit if I had just red one more reply, huh? bsky.app/profile/alva...
It boils down to people having so much of their self-worth tied to their opinions. Thus, they don't strive to BE correct, which necessarily requires acknowledging when we are wrong so that we may cease being wrong, and instead have to construct conspiracy theories as to why it's reality that's wrong
I first read that search term as cockware
I am SHOCKED to see that they haven't responded to this... Guess pretending to be illiterate only goes so far, huh?
How re you THIS bad at reading? What's that? I'm being told it's more likely that you understand perfectly what is being said, but you are so committed to your original statement, and so terrified of having to aknowledge having been wrong that you just pretend not to understand plain english...
I was explaining to my daughter how nervous I was for RCCC this weekend and she was like "Don't worry dad, no one knows who YOU are. You probably won't be very busy at all". She is a gem.
She's going to be heartbroken when you prove her wrong
*didn't Because this walking Dunning-Krugger billboard is going to latch onto that typo otherwise
Really can't get much more clearer than that
What-s the difference, according to you?
No. You want to punish someone you don't like even if it's against the law. That's as MAGA as it gets Meanwhile, the people here are telling you how thubgs ARE, even if they don't agree with your feelings
That's technically DCEU. Although yes, since it's integral to Peacemaker, some version of it is still cannon
Not entirely true. Creature Commandos, which features two (2) softcore sex scenes, one (1) of them featuring a reanimated corpse (and the other featuring Rick Flagg Sr.), as well as some very graphic kills, is technically the first new DCU entry
Important info bsky.app/profile/moll...
Expert here. What happens is the generative AI you fed this to is a piece of shit that tried to extrapolate a shadow into what statistically should be flesh, while you sat there loudly saying "ENHANCE. ENHANCE." like a dipshit.
Dammit. I misspelled @kevinnewburn.bsky.social in the alt text!
Using one photo already on your phone, what is the announcement tomorrow at 2?
You will all be shocked to learn that Jim "Petite Boner" Kirk is the absolute winner who does shit like this:
I can't, in good conscience, like that abomination, but I appreciate the effort
No, you're literally saying "who cares if the image is fake?" And that's what I'm arguing against. Because that attitude makes you indistinguishable from the median MAGA voter, just one in another direction
Don't use words you don't understand
"I don't care about bad arguments as long as they support my side" is literally MAGA behavior Pointing out that this "enhanced image" is complete BS that tells you nothing is not saying he's ok. It's saying that it's complete BS that tells you nothing Why do you WANT to fool yourself?
"I'm wondering why anyone cares about this like facts and reality" is EXACTLY how we ended up here in the first place Be better
Because "enhancing an image" is not a thing in the real world, only on TV That and looking at all the shit that got just mauled by the "enhancement" (just look a the flag in the hat)
The number of people engaging with this as if "enhanced the photo" was a real thing and not code for, "an LLM added some of its hallucinations to it" is just depressing
I am 1,000% saying it is incorrect. Literally just look at yhe flag in the cap
Wtf does "enhanced it" mean? What exactly did you do to it?
It 3xplictly isn't 🙁
Enjoy it. Come back when you're ready
Love the wordplay. Can't overlook the cosmological inexacritude
Oh no! Tom! What you doing baby???
You can 100% skip the jalapeño if you want (my wife did when the kids were younger), and it'll still come out tasting very good Hope it helps! inmamamaggieskitchen.com/pescado-la-v...
Hang on, let me find you a recepie in English. No spicy flavors in it and it does change the taste substantially
What are they doing now?
Have you tried Pescado a la Veracruzana?
Like she cares / doesn't know...
Honestly thought this was a Trump reference for a second
Breaking: Rudy Giuliani as he passed said “Donald Trump survives.”
Day 9 of trying to be hired by Andrew Cuomo
And Doomcock is?????????
Yet another reason to leave the nazi-plataforming site @miketanier.bsky.social @mattlombardo.bsky.social Hope you dont get negatively affected by these cahnges
"Trading deficit means sending our money to other countries and leaving us poorer" is on the same level as "If you need more money why don't you go buy more at the bank?" as posed by my then five-year-old I'm sorry you're too stupid to understand basic economic concepts
Why are you transcribing my skeets?
Tom Nichols follower tag as perfect proxy for Clown tag still undefeated Even when it comes to things like sports, apparently
Did the sovcit go on a blocking spree? Or just me?
To be fair, that's only because you're a fucking idiot who struggles to understand basic English, as demonstrated again and again in this thread
Last day OF THE SEASON, RIGHT????
Not remotely as dumb as wanting to not help them and possibly win them over / DISMISH HUMAN SUFFERING because of how they voted, so...
bsky.app/profile/alva...
It's also a perfect illustration of why trying to impose neat exclusionary boundaries (like exclusively binary sex definitions for humans) is INCREDIBLY stupid and leads to nonsensical results
If only this was relevant to the topic being discussed and could teach someone exactly why insisting on putting artificial binary definitions on things like sex is a very stupid idea that doesn't conform with reality...
Here's the thing: The reason why you can classify mammals as a type of fish is that, when it comes to biology, using arbitrary binary definitions basically never confirms with reality. Which is why you either define fish in a way that exclude a lot of fish, or you define it in a way that includes us
Not really The problem is that, LIKE MOST THINGS IN BIOLOGY, putting arbitrary binary definitions doesn't really fit well with reality. So yeah, depending on where you draw the line, either everything is a fish or many fish aren't fishes If oh the TERF could learn from this...
Why are you referring to yourself in the third person? And in plural?
You keep lying to yourself, pumpkin
Those are two completely different statements. You understand that, right? Even someone as ompatrntly stupid as you sees that those are not at all the same two statements, right?
She's trying to explain to you, the functionally illiterate bigot who clearly doesn't understand what the paper they're claiming supports their position, what said paper ACTUALLY says You might learn something (you won't, because bigots don't care about facts but you COULD)
It does not actually say that. Which you would know if you weren't a co plete idiot. But since you are, just trust those of us who can actually parse simple sentences when we tell you it doesn't
Well, you seem to do it via wildly unwarranted confidence
I can think of very few things I'd want less than beingsuch a gullible moron that I'd but into SovCitery
I see we have arrived at the "Cargo Culting insults" part of the procedure
Like I said: spatially limited ballistic aquatic hunting
Hey, aren't you the one who whines and cry about people putting words in your mouth? Why do you then just make shit up like anyone caring about a legal definition of an idiot? You're not special. You're the quintessential run-of-the-mill idiot
"You're rubber I'm glue" is STILL not going to work, no matter how you trt to dress it up
Better yet, their TV
Billionaire and world record holder to wed regional sports champion
This just means they've already predetermined that KC will win the SB so they can get married as the confetti falls, Matt! Obviously! /s
announcing the engagement on cutdown day smh
I'm drfinitelt going to need a source on that actually being what the whole argument is about
Wait, the idiot who claims to use biology to justify their bigotry is actually completely ignorant of biology??? My world is shaken!
An assault on their right to not feel sad!
Ok. And? So what?
That's Brees, Stafford... Theisman? I'm SO bad at uniform numbers...
Gambit Jubilee Wolverine Rogue Nightcrawler
The funny thing is animals actually can suffer and we slaughter them by the billions but sure let’s have an existential panic over whether a software program screams when we turn it off
This was, hands-down, the most wholesome and uplifting thing to ever feature this many F bombs Absolutely loved it
Well, MY friend @jorgelcrisp.bsky.social who still loves in his native Scotland probably has some thoughts about this...
Did he do it Marilyn Monroe style?