You followed your half-baked apology with a "fuck off." When Sky rejected your apology, you made no further efforts to make amends, but rather doubled-down on your needless hostility. You have now written multiple paragraphs defending your non-apology, instead of simply shutting up.
Apparently you were self-taught when it came to apologizing. This explains a lot about your recent behavior.
Again, another "I'm sorry, but..." You should try an actual apology for once.
If I was misgendering someone, I would simply apologize with no qualifiers. But apparently they didn't teach you that in your PhD program.
Not much of an apology when you immediately follow it with a "fuck off."
Jed?
Is Johnny 5 not a robot? Thus, you are a bot account.
Sorry, I don't engage with bot accounts.
So true, man.
Normal response by a very normal account.
When did Biden violent squash protests? I don't disagree that he was weak rhetorically when it came to the protests (and was generally awful when it came to Israel), but he explicitly rejected the deployment of the National Guard.
Words have actual meanings. Liberals are definitionally not fascists. I'm less certain about you, an account that has spent the last couple hours defending white reactionaries that cheerfully voted to destroy immigrants, queer folk, and other vulnerable communities.
You people hate liberals more than you hate fascists.
I think it's an accurate assessment of the overwhelming majority of the population in many of these counties.
Hating reactionary whites that voted for global immiseration makes you a Nazi?
How is this Nazi speak?
Look in a mirror
"It was the libs who didn't vote for Kamala." "I didn't vote for Kamala." You admitted you're a lib.
You're a lib?
You're literally lying about AOC, lol. So I guess you have something in common with Trump too.
I thought Trotskyites weren't real Marxists?
What did they say about the results of the 2024 election?
If someone responds to your writing, that means it's good. This is why I know I'm a good writer, since I had over 500 angry comments under my unreadable LOTR slashfiction.
Huh, interesting how everyone who knows you IRL finds you utterly repellant.
Lmao, your ex left you and now you're raging against women's lib.
What type of hat? Top hat? Beret? Bowler?
Lmao, this is an embarrassing. You argue like a child. "I could totally prove my point. I never said I would."
Any day now?
Uh huh, surely you can substantiate this claim, right?
Yes, the critically important value of sephiroth posting on a niche social media site, wow.
You know what passports he has? Also, is your brain leaking out of your ears. What are you even babbling about at this point?
Nice LARP, big boy.
Doug Emhoff isn't Israeli. You really aren't beating the fashy allegations.
Conley wasn't lynched. Leo Frank was, and for some reason, you continue to justify his murder.
Do you believe that his usage of racist tropes, however deplorable, is an admission of guilt, much less a justification for his extrajudicial murder?
It wasn't Leo Frank, as it overwhelming modern consensus. Conley's own lawyer was convinced of Frank's innocence in the years that followed.
Did you just search black and start responding?
You're literally the one dying on the nazi propaganda hill for some godforsaken reason.
I can look at you posts. Every one of your recent posts has been a defense of an antisemitic account gloating about a Jewish man's lynching.
Calling other people klan buddies is rich from the person currently defending the lynching of a Jewish man by KKK.
It's the same person, just different names she goes by.
It was Axel Folio / Dr. MRO / Mary Rambaran-Olm, a mildly popular medievalist.
What do you mean you disagree? I am looking at Twitter right now. The other quote tweets are filled with people making the exact same argument.
She is literally making the exact same argument as the other quote tweets who are open white supremacists. Like if you blurred out her name, her tweet would be indistinguishable from Nick Fuentes.
How are they misrepresenting her? Because it sure seems like she was justifying his lynching, especially given the quote tweets are filled with explicit neo-nazis making the exact same claims.
Why would I follow a Nazi propagandist advocating for lynching jews?
Quote tweeting with replies turned off. Not beating the spineless allegations.
Really, that's all you got. You searched for two key terms (and not even all the permutations that would actually get results) to prove I'm a secret Zionist.
Not beating the david duke allegations
Are you aware that race is a social construct and that the current American perception of race is not universally applicable over time and space.
She's a zionist because she called you out for pushing Nazi propaganda? Really, that's the line you're going with?
New York is literally the most linguistically diverse city in the world, lol. So I don't think your claim was particularly accurate.
By what metric is Dubai more culturally diverse than New York?
Just beefing with my girlfriend's potential voters. Things are going great at Kat HQ.
But no one was talking to you? The reply was to Kat?
Why are you talking in first-person, as if you were Kat?
Sorry, I'm not a narcissist and that I actually consider the ways in which alternative medicine and other pseudoscientific beliefs cause real harm, especially to vulnerable communities.
Akashic records? Energy healing? Functional medicine? These are all fine? Because I'd call it pseudoscientific nonsense that stops people from receiving legitimate forms of treatment.
Hey, try reading the article. She doesn't want a Popeyes for any moral reasons but because she wants to personally buy the property and rent it out for her own financial gain.
As opposed to the NIMBY landlord who runs an "alternative medicine" center that promotes dangerous pseudoscience.
It's cool that your comfortable with a movement that's ruined countless lives across the globe. Am I supposed to pretend that these pseudoscientific communities didn't play a significant role in the measles outbreak in Samoa, for instance?
"Crunchy things" is an interesting euphemism for deleterious pseudoscience that pushes the most vulnerable from receiving legitimate treatments
Cherry-picked? That's rich coming from you, the account who intentionally selected the two least offensive practices out of all their quack programs. And maybe you should trying looking up what "functional medicine" actually is, and how RFK is intimately involved in the movement.
Yep, those are the only two services at Heartwood. Oh wait...
Here's one of their practitioners implicitly denying germ-theory. Reminds me of a certain Kennedy.
You should actually take a deeper dive into the website before you open your mouth.
Their website is fully of complete quackery. Akashic records? Astrology? Energy healing? This is all rank pseudoscience masquerading as medicine. No one should support this shit.
Sick bothsideism. Sorry, who is the current head of HHS?
It also shows she's comfortable associating with the harmful pseudoscientific circles that gifted us with RFK.
Who are you even arguing with? Everyone here voted for Harris. Stop yelling at the imaginary leftists in your head.
What's the issue? Like I'm genuinely asking.
I wouldn't call "I'm sorry you feel that way" a legitimate apology.
I don't know, maybe the corrupt coal barons that they keep voting for.
Yes?
I certainly think I'm smarter than you, the supposed "leftist" whose diatribes against "global finance" could have come straight out of Mein Kampf.
So that's a no then?
Do you know what dogwhistles are?
"I'm sorry you feel that way" isn't a real apology.
So how do you know they're New Yorkers?
This is so cool, because it's the exact same argument right-wingers use when people talk about racism, especially about the usage of dogwhistles.
So you're just making shit up then.
Who are you quoting?
You understand I'm not pulling this out of my ass, right. Like there is plenty of evidence, both anecdotal and empirical, illustrating my point. Unhealthy food is viewed is viewed as more manly, while fruits and vegetables are disparaged as "girly."
Because you fundamentally refuse to acknowledge how misogyny manifests within American society.
Have you not understand a single word of what I wrote? The whole point is these things aren't intrinsic or essential to a specific gender. We are talking about the social construction of gender, and how society categorizes language and activities as distinctly feminine or masculine.
I agree, it is weird to gender meals. And yet, people (and society as a whole) do it all the time. You have to recognize the problem to confront it. You sound like someone who insists they're color-blind when it comes to matters of race.
I'm not the one who denies the existence of misogyny and gender-based stereotypes.
You do understand we're not talking about my own perceptions, but how society as a whole categorizes certain things as innately feminine or masculine? Like, if you view advertising or media, you would be left with the impression that salads are for women.
Not really. Plenty of activities and things are gendered by society.
No, its about how you disingenuously invoke whiteness as a smokescreen for your misogyny.
If KBJ fits into the Warren Court, that undermines your own point. You understand that, correct?
So, how do you expect to draft and pass a new constitution? You still haven't clarified.
What's your alternative to voting? Because right now it seems like your suggestion is impotent posting.
How does posting about baseball get us a new constitution?
Posting? Posting hard?
Yeah, sure, Ketanji Brown Jackson definitely would have been "middle-of-the-road" in the 1970s.
Remember when you threatened to beat someone up, and then deleted it because it was the most embarrassing internet tough guy schtick imaginable?
