Great story, but please can someone tell him it's upside down.
Great story, but please can someone tell him it's upside down.
Yeah, that's a police job all day long.
Don't hold your breath.
Oh bollocks it is.
Already happened.
Yeah. Americans don't do irony.
On second thoughts, it might be cheaper for you to fly to Greece.
I'm from the UK but I'm in France atm. I could post some red onions but you would be liable for the import duties.
There is an argument she should be recalled to prison.
Didn't she plead guilty?
I think we should just ban people from saying we should leave the ECHR and let them appeal.
OK. I was wrong.
You will vote Labour. You know you will. Because you're not a knobhead.
Ever thought you might be serially gullible?
Go on, then.
Troll.
Speak for yourself.
Inspiring words, none more so than the word 'ex'.
Thank you. I'm out.
Look, I'm not going to play the game of ranking genocides. You're on your own on this one.
And that makes it worse?
The holocaust played out in real time. I see no difference.
Creeping authoritarianism? CREEPING??
Than music?
"Hey Mum, you'll never guess what I dreamt about."
You just did it.
Not really. That is usually used to refer to pensioners.
If you are that worried about language, you might want to rethink the phrase 'black economy' in this context.
He seems confused.
You know what they say, if you're not part of the solution......
How about irony?
If you are failing to understand the right, liberals and 'fake lefties', that's a huge proportion of the population you have no empathy with.
This nowhere near covers it.
Yeah, I'm not buying into the idea of elections being the opposite of political.
Best of luck with that.
Right, but at least there is a conscious and concerted effort to maintain separation of powers. The US seems to have given up on the idea.
Are you happy with the UK system?
TBF, it became obvious and inevitable the day you all decided that politically appointed judges with life tenure was a good idea.
You are.
Read my comment again.
It's a living. 🙄
(Translated for the profane)
I don't like him, but I would stand proudly by his side against these fascists.
No 'suicide' watch.
The first step would be to disagree with them on something.
You convinced me. They have my vote.
They can't even decide on a name.
The time between being asked for ID in a bar and being offered a seat on the bus has been officially measured at a fortnight.
I'm pretty sure this obsession with #smallboats has crossed the line into cult status.
That's on the same level as holocaust denial.
Proper man of the people, isn't he?
If it's only a thousand, can we deport them? No, stop me. I've fallen into that gammony ranty trap.
We could petition to negotiate freedom of movement. Just sayin'.
Assessed or accessed?
Why are women ignored? Does it begin with an M?
Love it. 🤣
Or a wholesome newspaper.
If you mean it wouldn't hold up for a minute in court, I would agree (whilst acknowledging that you are far more qualified to judge than I am).
Theirs, David. Sorry if I wasn't clear, I was just gobsmacked.
That is a ridiculous interpretation of the law.
Belief, Dayle. Learn to read.
Just make something up. It will be equally valid.
Her suicide risk just went through the roof.
You are right, but I suspect there's a lot of copy and paste going on. In any case, it's hardly damning or even conclusive.
No, but it makes you look like a fool.
Interests remain on the register for twelve months after they have expired. share.google/zmObqndjiheD...
Unite is not the only union of which she was or is a member.
You should be a bit more careful about calling people liars.
Interests remain on the register for twelve months after they have expired.
You need to pay more attention.
Every time someone uses the phrase 'Tori Light' (sic) it drives the narrative that mainstream politicians are all the same and strengthens the tendency to vote for lunatics.
Thank you. The first mainstream article I have read that comes close to understanding the appeal.
For clarity, PA were proscribed under an ammendment to the Terrorism Act 2000. Apologies for any confusion. My mistake.
Careful.
Best of luck with that.
Very good point.
Sorry, I missed your comment. I agree but it is a different argument. Those arrested yesterday were very brave, but they wanted to be arrested in order to demonstrate the unfairness of the proscription.
Oh, I don't know. Stick around.
We are in the UK, Barry. Try to keep relevant.
Shooting trespassers is definitely illegal.
Can we take it that you have conceded the point that it was peaceful, if a little expensive?
Are you up to speed now?
The speed limit there would be 60mph and that's a maximum, not a recommendation. Good point, though.
In short, damaging planes on a base was always very illegal. What is different here is the perceived intention.
Yes. It might appear to be a very specific and narrow legal point, but they were proscribed for advocating serious disruption, the first to fall foul of the 2023 Act. The specifics of the disruption, whilst pertinent to its seriousness, are not what crossed the line into terrorism.
No.
The group we are discussing. Palestine Action.
It would still be illegal. PA is proscribed.
It went to the Court of Appeal.
The phrase is "serious disruption", Barry. You can be proscribed for entirely peaceful protest. Try to keep up. Public Order Act 2023 share.google/gaOdNhnpxiKO...
I would agree, but we had that argument in court and lost.
You missed the point. They were supporting PA, so their actions were illegal whether they were peaceful or not.
You must really struggle with speed limits.
It's too late for that. Since PA is proscribed, even that is illegal.
Aren't you arguing that PA doesn't deserve to be proscribed?
