"U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro" is in itself just a stunningly upsetting thing every time I see it.
"U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro" is in itself just a stunningly upsetting thing every time I see it.
Like on an airplane 😂
My eye groups all the things that are in the same big fancy font, so it looks like Putin is on the menu..
iow, wrt the frame, how do we even know?
The economic indicators we so often look at - jobs report, price index, etc., - are there legitimate complaints to be had about them? Given data availability, could the methods be better?
Well they used to be more so. Now I see Trumpers defending his actions by saying how much crime has fallen, as though it just happened in this year.
And investements selected by him "as President". Like he's twisting the knife a little by highlighting that now he gets to choose these things instead of congress.
I don't like the idea of term limits. It's not like we have a surplus of competent and honest people who are wanting to be politicians, so being forced to lose one when we find them is not great, and I don't see how having new people to take on the roles all the time is automatically beneficial.
He really does. The NYT does a recurring article with "best of" late night show jokes, Colbert, Kimmel, etc., and they include bits from this guy's own show (to be fair and balanced, I guess?) and they're always just dumb.
There's a reason he loves telling that "the snake" story to big crowds of his followers
"Ancient"
I doubt they even actually want a trial, they just want to create and fuel conspiracies.
The term gaslighting has become way overused, and indeed generally in situations where they could just say lying.
Weak attempt at a distraction is exactly right. I honestly do not expect them to try to take Obama to trial or much of anything else. They just want to gin up stories, fan the flames, and then drop it and move on.
Welp CBS, it was a good run
Ehh I don't know, I wouldn't count him out yet.
People need to stop putting close-up shots of his face in their stories. I'm trying to scroll here without throwing up.
This is a nightmare. If you see this and only think about it's whoever's fault or make excuses about why this is happening then you need to take some time to reflect. Yes, there's absolutely blame to be had. This needs to stop now, regardless of context. www.nytimes.com/2025/07/24/w...
I remember when this came out I was following Tom on the other site, and he had already been routinely commenting on Vance. Tom was absolutely calling him out for being an opportunistic a-hole before most people even knew he existed.
So often ignored in this. In large part he was just trying to get the loan servicers to make good on *existing* loan forgiveness programs like the PSLF.
Researchers have been using methods like machine learning and so on for many years, as they should. The things that are now, by social construction, getting the "AI" label, are pretty much just the dog shit part. Though I admit that that is all getting into varied individual definitions.
THIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSSSS!!!!
I feel ya, seagull
Defenders of the usefulness of AI, please just stop. It's like saying agent orange is good for removing weeds or asbestos for fireproofing or ..
*checks portfolio* .. not even down .. I think the markets, the wisdom of the masses, have grown tired of reacting to his baloney.
As an American who spent some time there, I love this. It bothers me when people think all Arabic countries are basically Saudi or Taliban ruled and that's the culture in general. - They do in fact like to party, including alcohol - Yes, even Muslims - And they have seriously hopping nightclubs
Not a prerequisite
Oof, come to think of it, this is assuming a *uniform* distribution 😬
I've heard of assuming a normal distribution, but this is ridiculous
Likely *well above*
I guess I still have some forms of hope left alive in me, because I had hoped these letters would be written better than his posts. Seeing this writing style in this format is somehow all the more jarring.
I don't believe anything from these people, and maybe there really is a list and all that, but at the same time I wouldn't be surprised to find out that in fact there really isn't.
It's also not how the mail works. "I want you to deliver these letters starting 12 PM on Monday!" Underpaid postal worker at the counter: "Um, sure thing, will do, Mr. President.."
He's oddly specific about when the first mail deliveries will be made.
Had to stop at the second one, made my stomach turn
Letters, eh? Anyone can send an email, but this must be serious!
Mentally unblur the text in the background and can't come up with anything that makes sense..
As bad as the spread of AI images is the habit of people calling other people "bots" when they don't like what they have to say. And people will even say "I looked at their profile and they're a bot", when their profile shows them having lots of actual human engagement, replies, etc.
News this morning says they passed the vote to bring it to the floor
Is Plum being held back from fighting here? Man I wish more of these games were on national television.
Not to be a downer, but this still sucks for all the other dogs in the neighborhood.
But wait, that would mean ... He's also a fentanyl-smuggling rapist who escaped from an insane asylum and likes eating cats and dogs!!! SAD
Kinda like when they see "LGBTQ+" they think of it as a list of porn categories.
Because "black". Just one big monolithic homogeneous everywhere global issue, and if black people are involved, like for some weird reason in Rwanda and the Congo, then that must be mostly what it's about. /s, just to be clear
Because people actually do watch it and the sport is growing.
Optimist here.. I think there is a limit to how good these things can get, and we're nearly there. People are realizing those limitations and AI is developing a reputation for being not so great. Instead of companies proudly declaring "we're using AI!" they will begin shamefully trying to hide it.
The four words are: "Life. This went fast."
Y'know, if Trump were to get permanently stuck on one of his many forms, if I had to pick a Trump, I gotta go with hash brownie Trump.
Lol perfect
Will be?
"Is that Freedom Rock? Well then, tell me a detailed history about it!"
The irritation you see here with AI is the tip of the iceberg. People hate it. And it definitely is not the new WWW.
So even for Australians it takes about 15 hours to fly to Australia
I assume we are to read this post in the Anakin/Padme meme format
That's why you never regain sanity!
I often wonder how they come up with the "why" the markets moved. "Up today on news that..", or "down today due to worries about..", and "remained steady while investors await.." Aren't those all assumptions, let alone overly broad generalizations? "Investors didn't react today, because meh.."
(Is a joke about the incompetence of congress)
There's a lot of silly complaining about the use of the word silly
McCain also famously once said, well, you know, about Iran..
To be fair, they're claiming Iran might develop a nuclear weapon before this congress could get something they want to do done, which is not an entirely outrageous point.
It's sort of our go-to move
Had to put a bookshelf in there
No, my question was why do people criticize the news organizations themselves for not providing the content for free
Or river of darkness, either one
Okay yes, but how do you expect them to be funded now? Because the advertising model is clearly inadequate and incentivizes "click bait" and other bad behavior. Simply declaring they should be free doesn't say how.
Widespread access would be great, but why do so many have the expectation that the producers of news should also be the subsidizers of its production? It's like saying everyone should have access to free healthcare (and they should), and that it should be paid for by the hospitals themselves.
"If"
I would say "oh no, this isn't good", but, well first it's Trump so that's a given, but also he announces a lot of things that turn out to be nothing special. I mean he could be declaring war or some other awful thing, but my guess he just wants to make more blustering tough guy threats to Iran.
New protest sign just dropped
From a randomly following stranger.. You post smartly funny things, and your selection of reposts is most excellent as well. Sometimes you haven't posted in a few days and then when you do it is like getting something cool in the actual mail.
And now you know a little about how men feel
At this point I'm surprised you ask any AI to do anything
Didn't really say he was surprised though? More of a publicly calling out the leadership to speak up. Doesn't mean he expects that to happen either, just that it should.
bs = beltway spin
"Feedback" .. and what will the method be for sorting through this feedback and choosing which ones they will act on? Whichever ones they like, and then they can deflect criticism by saying they are responding to "feedback".
They're pulling the same move of calling protests "riots" to get people on board against them
Doesn't look like a bot to me?
Thank you, though it's disappointing to discover it's more than I want to do.
Assuming that cucumbers are not self-aware
Without even checking, I'm going to say probably not. There have been tons of fake joke Bondi quotes on here.
If my childhood is correct, that can be solved by eating a hunk of cheese
And also.. All of those men survived? And were found and gathered together decades later to take this photo? But only the ones on the right half of the plane?
Also remarkable because Musk, in his usual spirit of wanton destruction with the belief that that is magically somehow automatically beneficial, has turned that power and spotlight on Trump, and ultimately himself.
GET OUT OF MY MIND!!
It's not that it is being said, it's who's saying it.
Always "surprised that Biden didn't" end the contracts ... and yet he himself also did not end the contracts, which is unsurprising because? And now he might do so because which thing changed? Just so we're clear..
"they don't give us any credit for the extraordinary economic growth that will be spurred along by this bill" In other words, "they didn't modify the results to reflect our (utterly insane) belief that this is good policy" That is not a difference in methodology, it's a difference in faith.
Yeah that's an 8 with an asstricks next to it
Is his cabinet .. holding a contest to see who can be the most like a Batman villain? I'm just now realizing this and it explains so much!
People should do something about this! I, for one, have liked and replied to this post. Do your part! /s
Internet Exploiter
I truly wish we were all allowed one 10x "like" every day, and today this is where I would spend it.
I'm definitely no fan, but the reason he appears in the article is literally because his album is #1 on the charts.
Ah haa nice, okay thank you!
I got there, but it wasn't very elegant. I must be missing a trick to it? I tried: let m = 2^r => 2^s = 2^(2-r) = 4/m (by r + s = 2) and 4^r = 2^(2r) = m^2 and 4^s = (2^s)^2 = (4/m)^2 so 2^r + 2^s = 6 => m + 4/m = 6 => m = 3 +/- sqrt(5) and I just plugged that into m^2 + (4/m)^2 = x
