I really like pickled Herring, and I don't do debates. Define "we" https://wealthforlife.substack.com/
359 followers 274 following 2,156 posts
view profile on Bluesky
Yeah, the whole obsession with trying to determine which ideology was flowing through the brain of a seriously disturbed individual at some point in the past is irrational. Normal, socially well adjusted people with fully developed identities do not murder other people. Period.
Healthcare isn't an insurance problem or a profit center; it's public good that supports the hyper productive technological frontier. Capitalism 101
Stereotype breaking: Which demographic group in Sweden has highest % of 25-year-old women who have started higher education? 1. Born in Sweden with 2 foreign-born parents: 62% 2. Born outside of Sweden but arrived by age 7: 57% 3. Born in Sweden with 2 Swedish-born parents: 55%
Compare the real freedoms of Swedes over the last 250 years versus those promised but not universally provided to us in America. Take trespass for example. Look at freedom of movement and what happened during Covid. Look at a press that has always been State and Elite Establishment propaganda.
Seems like White America is finally waking up to the fact that they actually never had any of the freedoms that were advertised, but never delivered, in the declaration of independence and the bill of rights.
Yes, the absolutism is nauseating.
I want to point out that the historically most diverse and free press in the world has existed for well over a century in Scandinavia, and none of it tries to be unbiased. We are all products of environmental/cultural conditioning; we should acknowledge what science says about human neurology.
Except people are not "like this" everywhere where the internet exists...
The intelligence gap is hilarious
This violence is pathological and structural. Not political. open.substack.com/pub/wealthfo...
Blocked most follows over the last 72 hours
Risk premium
Our leaders are products of our institutional structure. A structure that produces violence.
Important piece in middle of a quite bizarre acceptance by the MSM of unscientific nonsense
Spencer Cox on CNN demonstrating an inexcusable ignorance of how the human mind works. He gets cause and effect backwards, talking about the overwhelmingly Anglo-Saxon males that routinely kill innocent civilians as if they were normal prior to being radicalized by political or religious ideology.
Socially well adjusted people with fully developed identities exist in every community in America. 70% of eligible Americans did not vote for the Demagogue. Just get involved with good people in your community.
Empathy isn't something one turns on and off selectively. Empathy is unconditionally experienced by socially well adjusted people with fully developed identities. Empathetic people serve humanity by applying knowledge, not ideology, to problems facing society.
đ€
It's structural and pathological. Not political.
Just the violent offspring of the dominant social class in a deeply dysfunctional institutional structure that we must reform to build a better America
This violence is not political. It's pathological and structural.
This violence, this ignorance, these foolish politicians; it's structural. open.substack.com/pub/wealthfo...
Patriarchy dies hard as Robert Graves said
What's significant?
We need basic common-sense reforms such as the creation of an independent Parliamentary Ombudsman office with full investigative and prosecutorial powers that it uses to enforce ethics rules, laws and the constitution and to safeguard legality, fairness, and trust in public administration
P. S. We know why avoidable murder is far more common in the US than in functional societies. "Well regulated militia" â individual self-assessment. Sweden: guns common, murders rare. Why? Licensing, training, storage laws, plus strong social safety net. They apply evidence, not ideology.
The result? Preventable suffering continues, and pundits, influencers and writers and politicians make a living peddling ignorance and voters "debate" solutions we already have. "Conservatives" and "Liberals" need to grow the hell up and sign up for a lesson in critical thinking. 6/6
Moralizing ignorance - left, right, whatever flavor - is no substitute for knowledge. The scientific method exists because intuition about complex systems fails. Yet we keep implementing ideology and ignoring crystal clear evidence. 5/
The research exists. RCTs, longitudinal studies, natural experiments. Filing cabinets full of what works. But it competes with what ignorant influencers and politicians and ordinary people *feel* should work based on their conditioning. 4/
Ideology beats evidence. DARE felt right but increased drug use. Scared Straight made crime worse. Meanwhile "soft" CBT & "expensive" home visits actually work. Same with housing-first, cash transfers, etc. 3/
Politics rewards quick visible "tough" responses over prevention that takes years to show results. Easier to build a prison than fund nurse home visits, even when prevention costs less long-term. 2/
We have decades of research showing what reduces violence & social problems. Early childhood programs, poverty reduction, mental health treatment - all proven effective. So why don't we implement them? 1/
Reality has a liberal bias đ
after reading media theory about this for MONTHS, i present my Grand Unified Theory of why video essays are so good these days! With many thanks to @lindsayellis.bsky.social, who provided her thoughts on the matter www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/st...
Respect
If it wasn't for the fact that Conservative ideas and policies have been, and are, objectively speaking the cause of avoidable death and suffering on an absolutely horrific scale, we could just move on to implementing knowledge based ideas and policies, but that's not where we are at. đ
Yes, and we will not get what we need until we reform our archaic and maladaptive institutional structure that is not fit for purpose in the modern world. There's a reason incompetent and antisocial people are rarely elevated to positions of authority in the Scandinavian systems of government.
Exactly right. As I have said since I was a teen in the 1970s; show me one Conservative idea, one public policy, that's not also a central tenet of Liberalism, that's not in conflict with modern knowledge and science. Conservatives are people that cannot distinguish between opinions and knowledge.
Neither Bari Weiss et al or Ezra Klein et al have demonstrated the ability to distinguish between debate and truth, or ideology and knowledge, or persuasion and indoctrination.
Bari is another product of the very academic institutional structure that we are talking about here. An archaic and maladaptive departmental structure that has not evolved in any material way in response to what we have learned since the Enlightenment. A structure that elevates debate over science.
Culture is a product of institutional design; that's what must be recognized first. Western institutional structures are maladaptive because Conservatives all around the world deny that Evolutionary Biology, not 18th century philosophy, is the relevant discipline in the information age.
It's nuts! If we had a functional education system that's not based on ideas about knowledge, learning and human behavior that were disproven by science over a century ago, we would not routinely elevate incompetent and antisocial individuals to positions of authority; these problems are structural.
Ragnarök is now
That kind of ignorance of history is why we are here today as a nation
I am not surprised!
Neither American Liberals nor American Conservatives have a functional concept of how the modern financial system actually works in real life. That's why People like Mamdani are labeled "radical".
Remember "No Child Left Behind"? Great educational concept. Dumb financial concept.
You are correct; there is no private market solution to the functional provision and allocation of necessary resources such as childcare, eldercare, healthcare, education, housing and transportation. The solution is the "Nordic" model. Federal funding of public sector supply of necessary resources.
We build a better America by distinguishing between opinions and knowledge. By forming pro-social groups that actively exclude antisocial and violent people.
Gorgeous
The answer is very simple; Ezra never learned to distinguish between persuasion and indoctrination. What Conservatives have been doing since 2015 is classical conditioning. People were not persuaded by Conservative arguments; they were indoctrinated.
Things change
Bigots don't like it when they are stood up
And the only people that consider me a "White" guy are Westernized racists conditioned by their cultures to believe that skin color and appearance separates humans into separate species. I am an indigenous member of a Scandinavian people.
Opinions are one thing. Knowledge another.
Failure to comprehend the information in the works of these domain experts due to inadequate background knowledge. Take your political purity tests to the bookstore and get back here when you have bothered to read, digest and produce an academic analysis of the corpus.
I said something last week that is more broadly applicable today: Calling for empathy is not neutral or apolitical when only one group of people have been socialized and brutalized into having empathy.
"How can artists and audiences approach music so that, to use PĂ€rtâs famous expression, âevery blade of grass has the status of a flowerâ? share.google/49cdvDXztObM...
Runs; male objectification of women as legitimate targets for their perversions, is endemic in patriarchal societies. We need fundamental institutional reform.
This is class solidarity. In case youâre at all confused.
What this is, is the unconscious compliance with the demands of Patriarchy by its beneficiaries. Absolutely pathetic human beings.
Same ignorance straight through
We know what's wrong with Patriarchy and the men and women that benefit from it.
The real question is; what's wrong with the minds of pundit consumers?
Everyday above ground offers a simple choice; ignorance or knowledge.
Same
Rhetoric is one thing. Criticism of ignorant and harmful public policies is another.
Best idea
So much for my impression that Gavin Newsom had learned that antisocial individuals must be actively excluded from functional groups.
The only thing deserving of hate is hate
We know exactly how to minimize violence in human societies while maximizing freedom, but Conservatives don't accept what modern knowledge and science says. It's that simple.
Every functional society in history has strictly controlled access to lethal weaponsâfrom samurai monopolies to medieval weapon bans to modern gun laws. Unregulated armament means chaos; civilization requires constraining individual violence for collective survival.
No functional society lets individuals decide their own fitness to bear armsâaccess to lethal weapons is always strictly regulated. Why? Evolution shows that while selfishness beats altruism within groups, altruistic groups beat selfish ones. Unchecked individual power destroys collective strength.
Violence has no place in functional societies
Yes, there's no devil or hell in the inner teachings of Christianity, something that existed long before the birth of Jesus of Nazareth. And Abraham, Jesus and Muhammad are one "thing", but these are things one cannot fruitfully explore in most existing forms of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
The ignorance is the message
Seattle doesn't need development. Like most American cities, Seattle needs redistribution of assets such as housing and land from the private sector to the public sector.
The Nordic model's lesson isn't the specific policies but the demonstration that conscious institutional evolution is possible. They proved humans can deliberately shape their own social evolution.
It's irrelevant what Trump voters thought; 70% of eligible Americans did not vote for Trump. Harris lost because she failed to understand the world we live in in the 21st century and she, like all too many "progressives" do not understand money and finance.
The Swedish Social Democratic example becomes even more relevant here. They succeeded not by adhering to ideological purity but by accurately reading their moment and building institutions that matched actual social and economic dynamics of a an industrial society transitioning to post-industrial
The Democratic Party leadership clearly do not understand the evolutionary epochal phase transistions that are happening. They are rotating inside of inaccurate political and ideological concepts that are less inaccuarate the Conservative concepts, but still rotating inside of inaccurate concepts.
I think she could have won by dropping the Neoliberal policies and gone full Social Democrat; that's what I am saying. Her housing policy, which is arguably the most important issue today for most American workers, was explicitly Neoliberal and would have increased housing costs and rent.
Amen. And this is why Harris lost to the Demagogue; she ran on the same old Neoliberal policies that the Democratic Party has rolled out since Bill Clinton.
On her way to work this morning my wife stopped at the school to drop off a kid ... except there were no kids in the car.
Haha I just saw the same thing in our fridge last night
This seemingly counterintuitive approach forced inefficient firms out of business while allowing highly productive companies to retain higher profits. The result was both economic dynamism and equality - creative destruction with a human face. 3/
The cornerstone of their system coordinated wage bargaining between powerful unions and employer associations through a "solidaristic wage policy" that deliberately compressed wage differences. Low-productivity sectors saw wages pushed up while high-productivity sectors had wages restrained. 2/
Between the 1930s and 1970s, Swedish Social Democrats transformed a relatively poor nation into a prosperous, egalitarian society without resorting to revolutionary measures like wealth taxes, defunding the police or abolishing private property. 1/
Remind me again which party spent the last decade railing against so-called cancel culture?
bsky.app/profile/kltb...
Superimposition of various earthly fixations upon higher order texts is a feature of Patriarchal societies such as Rome and the modern, industrialized Westernized societies that are the children of Rome. Ironies shall never cease....
"Rome" is a metaphor for a particular mental model in the minds of the pupils, and "coin" and "debt" and "jubilee" are factors in the psychological education of the pupils. Just like the golden "rule" isn't a rule but a test of the relative ignorance of the pupil by the teacher.
Reform the Constitution. It's hilariously maladaptive that ignorant politicians are able to interfere with the domain experts of the American administrative state. It's as if we have learned absolutely nothing in the last three hundred years.
The wishes of the teacher and the inclinations of the pupils. The usefulness of the teacher's wrongness and the uselessness of the pupil's rightness. Those that interpret the religious texts literally are lost.
đ€