Polycrip: AuDHD SPMS, INTP, Ace, Feminist, "Hard Left"ist, wide awoke, Author, Artist and part-time Libertine. Views my own, but everyone is entitled to my opinion 💋
2,170 followers 1,448 following 4,320 posts
view profile on Bluesky
This one, at least, is getting global media coverage. They are EXTREMELY conservative (as in uber-resistant to it until it's absolutely undeniable), so there's just no arguing now. Netanyahu can scream all he likes, but it IS genocide. And he IS due an appointment to 'hang out' in the Hague.
This is exactly WHY I have been saying the RoW needs to let Trump have his way, to be isolationist, to cut the US off from the rest of the world, and pick up the mantle of New World Order ourselves. Best way to avoid shit hitting the fan is not being attached to the fan.
Oh no, America might have to start actually paying for things in real currency. How on Earth will the 'worlds greatest economy' survive when it has to operate like every other economy, in the real world? Yeah, you're probably right. It won't.
It's official, Israel IS committing genocide in Gaza.
The IAGS announcement:
If anyone is SERIOUSLY still under the delusion that Harris would have stopped the Israeli genocide, bear this in mind. The DNC are STILL refusing an arms embargo on Israel, even as the IAGS confirm Israels' Gaza operation IS genocide. www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/...
But wait, there's more... How did you manage to parlay this VERY CLEAR MESSAGING into 'Kalama will be better for Palestine' and 'Kamala wants to end the genocide'? The DNC are STILL supporting Israel now! Are you actually so addicted to hopium it's impacted your ability to relate to reality?
Maybe she should have lied about it more, as she clearly never had ANY intention of ending the genocide. Which you know, but refuse to admit. Just a few examples of where she made it quite clear she was always going to be Netanyahu's arms dealer from the get go.
Two can play at this... BTW I'm not blocking you because I want your sub-standard trolling, self-humiliation and 'Genocide for the Win' bullshit to remain readable to normal people who think immolating babies is a red line. You are, however, now screeching unheard into the void. Enjoy.
Yes, they really did say that. The troll has finally admitted defeat and posted the same reply on every thread. "Not voting for genocide is selfish, and voting for genocide saves lives." I give you Blue MAGA. Guilty, stupid, sad. [Extra +2 points for willingness to self-humiliate for the DNC]
The high pitched whining and smell of hysterical straw clutching maybe. It does reek of Karen, I have to admit.
PLEASE do not tell me that is a woman? I've never seen such poor quality trolling and self-humiliation as a badge of Pride on anyone who wasn't an inadequate, "professional incel with a trust fund" manbaby. I guess Blue MAGA is an equal opportunities cult.
You only managed to come up with ONE response then, and have just posted it on every comment line. You lack creativity, as well as application, rationality, basic intelligence and a personality. Come to think of it, you're a Democrat! Blue MAGA. Explains everything. I accept your surrender, GG.
Get new material, this stuff doesn't work.
Ah screen posting. You're expecting to get blocked, guess you realised your trolling is so under par that it actively bores people. Perhaps I should return the favour and screen some of your 'gems', like the 'vote for genocide to end genocide' ones, those are funny. Sad, pathetic little troll.
800 times higher eh? According to gov data, the average wait time in England for non-urgent referrals is 18 weeks. If Scotland has wait times that are 800 times higher, this means people in Scotland are waiting 800 x 18 weeks, which equals 14,400 weeks OR TWO HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SIX YEARS. 🤣🤣
I wouldn't mind if they weren't so fcking BAD at it...
I don't think anyone who cares about Gaza (or has a functioning brain) voted for Trump. Not sure why you think differently? I can't comprehend the stupidity of voting for the genocide to continue thinking it was better for Gaza. Yet here you are.
Well to be fair, you claimed then and claim now that Harris wouldn't have continued the genocide, even though she was openly saying she was going to and everyone knew that. But I guess you're self-aware enough to understand why people are calling your BS and being right about it. So thats good.
Because you're a sealion. And yes, you are indeed a waste of time.
Whereas voting for it changes.... oh, nothing. Yet you still think everyone should do it. I wonder why. Democrats sure do love the status quo.
You have yet to provide ANY evidence that I have lied about anything. Just as you have yet to provide ANY evidence that Harris wasn't just as genocidal as Biden and Trump, despite your claims that her genocide would have been 'better' than theirs. This is what you look like:
It's not like Netanyahu had ever had anything fear from the Democrats, from Biden or from Harris. They hadn't even attempted to reign him in, and Harris had pledged not to in future. I think you're now straying into the realms of pointless trolling. Nobody is as stupid as you're pretending to be.
Netanyahu is corrupt. Trump is corrupt. (Harris etc are too, but in a less 'proactive' way). If you think Palestine was anything to do with why Putin wanted Trump elected then you're insane. So why do you think Palestine had anything to do with why Netanyahu wanted him elected?
He voted for them, silly, that's how you get them to stop doing the things you don't like, by voting for them to continue doing those things! Apparently.
YOU VOTED TO KEEP KILLING PEOPLE BY THE TENS OF THOUSANDS. How you ha e the gall to use the words 'sacrificing lives to make a useless stand' is quite breathtaking. You're not only a fuckwit, you're a fucking hypocrite as well.
Oh don't worry, I don't block, I just mute. So when I stop responding you will never know whether I walked away or stopped entertaining you because it got too boring. I reckon you can probably guess though.
And it will ever be so until you stop voting for bad candidates. Until you teach them that they don't get the votes unless they stop being evil, they will continue to be evil. It *must* be what you want, they reason, since you keep voting for it... Don't you get that?
In your dreams perhaps, but you are living and breathing hopium against ALL the evidence. Why on Earth why would I want to 'own libs'? You ppl are worse than MAGA, and they're not worth saving never mind owning. Don't flatter yourself, you are less than worthless, to Palestinians AND to America.
Go ahead, substantiate your claims with proof. Show me where she said she was going to end the genocide. Where she said she'd stop arming and funding Israel. Where she said she would at LEAST make support conditional on not doing war crimes. She said none of these things, but have it. I'll wait
Her position was EXACTLY the same as Trump - continue to arm and fund the genocide, placing no restrictions on Israel whatsoever. She said so more than once. If voting to continue genocide is your idea of action to stop genocide then you have much bigger problems than semantics.
Yes, I did. When you have learned to debate like an adult human being with an at least moderate education and understanding of things like logic, let me know. Until then, run along and deal with your internal turmoil and self-hatred somewhere else. Your pointless sealioning is boring.
So why are you so fiercely defending the genocidal candidate and blaming people who didn't vote for her for her losing to Trump? Seems you are pretty committed to Harris as a candidate and think it's imperative and undeniably desirable that ppl voted for her. Which is enthusiasm, like it or not.
Show me the posts on your timeline that mention Gaza from before the 24 election. Because if there ARE, I will withdraw the statement. But since there are NONE (because you weren't on Bsky) then it's still true. Attorney at LOL? You couldn't even pass THAT bar exam.
There aren't. Go look.
There is no evidence to suggest that on Gaza, Harris would have been ANY different in terms of outcome to Trump for the Palestinians. In fact the evidence is that she would have been. In any case, there is no 'better' or 'worse' genocide, genocide is genocide and it is THE red line for normal ppl
Your hypotheticals are irrelevant, the toll would be 2m under either President. And I wouldn't vote for anyone who was pledging to continue the genocide but only for another 100k deaths. We all know you go blank check on the numbers, so why are you asking?
What's that thing they say "The cruelty is the point"?
I know you keep saying that but there is absolutely NO evidence to support that claim. In fact all the evidence is to the contrary. You will have to admit this to yourself eventually, or the cognitive dissonance will make you ill.
BREAKING: yesterday Labor rightly condemned anti-migrant rallies. The same day they signed a $400m plus secret deal with Nauru to allow them to forcibly deport up to 100,000 people without their consent. Labor’s dog whistle politics is so much part of the problem.
NEITHER, they were both committed to continuing the genocide. You really must drop this delusion that Harris was only kidding when she said she was all in on arming and funding Israel without conditions. She really wasn't. If you voted for that, you voted for that.
And that's why you won the Grand Prize - this is where Lesser Evil voting ends up. Every. Single. Time. Doing more of it only kicks the can down the road. You created the reality of no good choices by your willingness to vote for bad candidates because they weren't 'the other one'. Enjoy!
You didn't save a single life by voting for genocide. Sorry if that's some mind of surprise. I think most people would have figured it out ahead of time, but...
You're that committed to voting for, and garnering votes for, your war criminal candidate that her complicity in the murder of tens of thousands of children is no kind of red line. If she ate American babies would that have mattered either? Likely not, you were that enthusiastic for her to win.
You're telling people that not voting for genocide was a mistake. You're telling people that they should have voted for your candidate even though she was a war criminal standing on a platform of continuing genocide. You're so enthusiastic you can't see that 'Genocide' is unelectable even vs Trump
As I have said repeatedly, based on the evidence, NEITHER. Harris categorically said she would fund and arm Israel without conditions. That means regardless of what they do. In black and white, she said that. You want to believe she was lying? Go ahead, but she wasn't. She was already complicit.
Not like the DNC haven't let jerrymandering pass for twenty five years or more, bit late to start relying on it as an excuse now.
As I have now said I think three times, my not voting for Harris has had precisely the same outcome for Palestine as if I *had* voted for her to continue the genocide. What part of 'voting for genocide because there is no other option is anti-genocide' seems rational to you? Voting isn't action.
If Gaza had crossed your mind, then voting for a war criminal complicit in the genocide there, who doubled down on her commitment to continue arming and funding that genocide 'without restriction' would have been impossible for you. But it wasn't. Because it didn't. Or at least, wasn't a red line.
I don't think you do, despite your best efforts today I'm not convinced you're actually that dense. I think you didn't really care what happened in Gaza, you just didn't want to deal with Trump as President for your own reasons. Genocide simply wasn't a red line for you. I get it.
There is absolutely NO EVIDENCE that Harris was ever going to do anything to end or even mitigate the genocide in Gaza. SHE SPECIFICALLY SAID SHE WASN'T GOING TO. If you vote for someone to continue genocide, why do you think they will take that as your asking them not to continue genocide?
Understandable. Apparently, according to the Democrats, voting for a war criminal to carry on arming and funding a genocide is the way you prevent genocide. As opposed to NOT voting for the genocidal war criminal, which is apparently facilitating genocide. It's all very confusing.
Exactly the same as voting for Harris would have achieved for them. Except I didn't explicitly reward a war criminal for their war crimes, or make myself a war criminal to do it. Hope that helps.
As it turned out, there wasn't one. That's how you end up winning the Grand Prize for Lesser Evil voting - sooner or later there is only Evil to vote for, and it always wins. Do you not understand this yet?
VPs have voices. Presidential candidates have LOUD voices. Presidential candidates take positions. Those positions are their policies. You are sounding really desperate.
As did I. Are you 12?
You not only voted for her, you believed and still believe everyone should have voted for her (genocide not withstanding), and berate anyone who didn't. You blame those who didn't vote for her for her losing the election. That sounds pretty fucking enthusiastic support for a candidate to me.
It's not a lie to say you have no mentions of Gaza on your timeline prior the November election. You've given an explanation why. That doesn't mean it's not still true. And therefore, by definition, NOT a lie. Grow up.
You have not explained ANY lie. You voted for Harris. You think everyone should have. You berate anyone who didn't. Genocide was NOT a red line. You did it because you didn't want Trump to be President. Continuing to kill children in Gaza was a price you were willing to pay. WHAT IS A LIE?
I clearly stated that when the options are genocide or genocide, there is no vote that would 'concretely achieve' anything for the Palestinians. Which is why it's so pathetic to see you think you're doing 'your part' by voting for more genocide as your contribution to ending genocide.
Not taking action to stop genocide, and/or complicity in genocide (by tacit or open support, arming, funding, protection of the perpetrator - eg vetoing UN resolutions, etc) is a war crime. So is voting to continue a genocide knowing it is happening. Which is why YOU are one too.
No, genocide doesn't have a better or worse, remember? She may have seemed better for YOU, which is, I posit, the reason why you were willing to endorse the continued genocide of Gaza because you preferred her to be President for your own reasons. Not because of any concern for Gazan children.
I have answered your question more than once now, you are ignoring the replies because they don't credit your strawman with any credibility as a premise. What did I say you did that you didn't do? You voted for Harris. You think everyone should have. The genocide wasn't a red line. Whats made up?
That is my answer. Your question is a straw man. No vote would have made things better for Palestinians, it's going to take much more than thoughts, prayers and token voting (especially Hopium-driven Lesser Evil voting). Your voting FOR genocide won't end it. Your voting against wouldn't either.
It helps me keep track of the fuckwits and fascism enablers. Might come in handy to have a list at some point. I'll add you to the Genocide Cheerleaders list too, just to keep things straight, you did vote for it, after all.
Aww, you're being supported by a member of the Genocide Cheerleaders Society, how sweet. The company you like to keep and yet STILL you pretend you weren't perfectly fine with sacrificing a million children to avoid getting the Grand Prize for Lesser Evil voting.
As I said, you must have been enthusiastic, because you are angry with people who didn't vote for her. You think everyone should have. That sounds pretty enthusiastic to me. And since voting for her was voting to continue massacring children, you were obviously comfortable with that. No lies.
She said she would place NO restrictions/conditions on arming/funding Israel. Including their genocide in Gaza. The 2 state solution is a fantasy Israel have ensured can/will NEVER happen. She stood on continuing the genocide. It made her a war criminal. Sorry that's inconvenient, but it's a fact.
I have answered your strawman. Why are you running away from reading it?
Neither are Israel, but that's not a problem for you.
Reposting the same populist article doesn't change the fact that you're starting from a point YEARS into the history of Hamas, and DECADES into the history of Palestine and the Zionist Project. You should try reading it. You might learn something.
Is that what you call people who refuse to vote for genocide and prop up the exploitative status quo that ensures 6 people own more wealth than 60% of the world at any cost? Is that the word for people who don't meekly participate in the sham because change is 'impossible'? If so, yep. And proud.
Then you're just as far down the denial hole as he is. It won't save you.
Because the 'left' are supposed to vote for the Democrats, no matter how right wing and disgusting the DNC becomes, no matter how much the DNC tell them to fuck off and die, and no matter how much they're ignored and marginalised by the liberal machine. And it drives them CRAZY when we don't comply
You couldn't find it on a map with neon lights around it's border. Sit down, we have no need of a Hasbara clown today.
Perhaps because that's the narrative Netanyahu is working very very hard to maintain. Same tactics as ISIS - everyone hates you, you're only safe here, we must fight for survival, etc etc
Genocide is genocide. There is no 'worse' genocide and 'better' genocide. It's not less of an atrocity if it's financed and armed by a brown woman with a big smile instead of an orange idiot with a criminal past. Might have been better for YOU. Which is why you voted for her, isn't it?
If Harris had attracted the votes of non-voters by offering them a platform and position on Gaza (and other issues) that appealed more than 'I am not Trump' she could have won. But she didn't, and she didn't. That's not the fault of the (non) voters.
The Gazans said they preferred anyone over Trump. This is not the ringing endorsement for Harris you seem to cling to belief in.
Oh dear. As I thought, you're coming in halfway through the Second Act. Hamas were incubated and supported by Israel to present a challenge to the PLO and Fatah so that Israel could avoid making peace with Arafat et al. Some background reading from the Prof of Modern Arab Studies @ Columbia U NYC.
You literally cited the jet etc as the reason why Trump is 'unconscionable'. Blue MAGA don't have a problem with genocide, only with plans to build a Trump Tower afterwards. Its almost as if there is NO principle or red line behind the concern for optics. Its why Centrism is the midwife of fascism
Israel had their chance and blew it, the Zionist Project has obviously and irredeemably failed. The US is about to fail too, for much the same reasons - hubris, reliance on 'lesser evil' voting to keep the status quo going, and misplaced exceptionalism. The New World Order is USA-free.
The US is isolating itself more and more each day. Within 18 months the USA will be an irrelevance on the global stage. Isolated, insular, world Pariah, and economic wasteland. It's what happens when you put up a shitty candidate against a fascist. The RoW will be fine without the USA.
What makes you think Hamas would be the government in Free Palestine? Do you know where Hamas came from and why?
So, what is a lie there?
You were prepared to vote for Harris, and you did. You must have been enthusiastic, else why are you berating anyone who didn't also vote for her? You endorsed the genocide and its continuation with your vote. You voted for Harris because you didn't want Trump to be President. ie YOUR preference
WHAT am I lying about? You keep saying that but you never give any actual evidence of any lies. Which one has to assume is because there haven't been any. (Also because I *know* there haven't been any and this is just another aspect of your projection and copium).
I already answered this strawman question. You need to find a different horse to beat, this one is dead.
You muted because you can't cope with the cognitive dissonance and it being pointed out to you that we all know what you did, and you will be living with the guilt and shame your whole life. Keep running, it will always be breathing down your neck.
It was not a large group, it was a very small selection. It says so right in the article. And even then, the best they could get out of it was 'we'd prefer anyone over Trump'. It's hardly the ringing endorsement you seem to think it is, is it?
And that's far more important to you than what, the same thing happening in Gaza but with a 'regretful' brown woman clutching her pearls in the Rose Garden whilst sending money to Israel to kill children by the ten thousand? Optics, always seems to be the centrist's primary concern.
Like what? What did I make up?
Because voting for genocide wouldn't help Palestinians in any way (no matter the war criminal chosen), I've never relied on casting a ballot in a pretend democratic process to make change happen. But I have been an anti-Zionist activist for five decades. Since before you even HEARD of Gaza.
WHAT LIES??? I am serious. What lies?
Perhaps instead of the US sending billions to Israel to support their apartheid ethnostate and it's settler colonial, white supremacist project, it could be used to reinstate the secular Levant, and establish a democratic Palestine with equal rights and religious liberty for all. There's an idea.
I didn't abstain. I also didn't vote to OK the mass murder of a million children because I thought that would keep me safe from the consequences of creeping fascism, at lest for a while. How did voting for genocide work out for you?
You're the one that voted for it. You're the one that paid for it under Biden, voted to continue paying for it, and ARE still paying for it. Good luck reconciling that with your need to not admit to being a racist war criminal fanboy. You will NEVER lose the stench of what you did.
Better alternative for WHO? Genocide is genocide. You are downing gallons of Hopium Koolaid how peaceable avowed Zionist Harris, who pledged to put NO restrictions on the arming and funding of Israel, would suddenly become after you voted for her to do the thing you are sure she wouldn't do. Why?
How am I responsible for something I didn't vote for? YOU were the one who voted for genocide, and you got what you voted for, just not with the war criminal in chief you preferred. I didn't vote for genocide OR Trump. Yet in your world, it's MY fault your genocidal candidate didn't beat Trump.
