Are such checks — beyond something like the Constitution — even possible on any top-level deliberative human-based system like the SCOTUS? I can’t think of any that isn’t problematic in that sense. Bias is a human problem, not a SCOTUS problem, I believe.
…but abstaining and risking a republican president appointing yet another Comey-Barret or Thomas, may have much worse consequences.
It may prove the only available path, to be sure, but if I read correctly Ms. Parker’s original post, she’s not asking us to load our muskets just yet. She is stating what would be necessary in a Dem candidate to warrant her vote. I myself would dread voting for a horrible candidate like Newsom…
I see. I don’t understand how the problem of the SCOTUS goes beyond its current composition. Had it always been problematic? How is it problematic beyond a conservative/transactional majority? In what sense should it be reformed (and how to achieve such reforms)?
Is there a way to “heavily modify” the Supreme Court without a majority in said Supreme Court and a 2/3 majority in Congress and the Senate? I can see only one: revolution. Is that what you’re proposing?
So, revolution is the answer? Because by your rationale no list of desirable traits in dem candidates will be of use. Is that it?
With 6x3 for the reactionaries, you’re right: no value at all. But that’s a feature of the current score, not of the institution itself, is it not?
If that is the case, then there is absolutely no point in talking about “Never Newsom, or defending any list of traits necessary for a candidate, for that matter.
Also: how would that be easier than keeping voting for progressives — however flawed they are — until the imbalance is reversed? Would a revolution — in essence what you are proposing, if I understand you right — be easier to achieve than the necessary change?
I’m sorry, am I getting this right? is your solution to the current Supreme Court imbalance to abolish the main branch of the judicial system? The one responsible for upholding the Constitution? I’m not trying to be confrontational. I am genuinely confused: how would that help to fix Democracy?
As much as many Democrats, like Newsom are flawed, the risk of having the next president appointing Supreme Court Justices of the caliber of the right wing majority that constitute today's Supreme Court is too high, I believe.
Comparing that to Biden -- a far from perfect defender of transgender rights -- we have a different outcome He appointed justice Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, a much more progressive justice, that even if not ideal, is far, far, FAR better than any of the three above.
Trump appointed religious fundamentalists Gorsuch and Coney-Barrett, and a "beer enthusiast" (and rapist) Kavanaugh, and América will suffer the dire consequences for generations to come.
My only qualm with "Never Newsom" is this: presidentes last 4 to 8 years, and as consequential as they are, aren't as consequential as the Supreme Court Judges they appoint, I believe.
Having Pritzker, Walz and other possibilities in play, (and it being still over 3 years away from the next presidential election), promoting Newsom is preposterous, I believe, no matter how much he "stands up to Trump.
I agree that Newsom has been acting in detrimento of trans people's rights for a long time -- adn for strictly political reasons, utterly devoid of principles -- and is far from an ideal (or even acceptable) candidate in that regard (and many others).
So, is America tired of winning yet?
In other words, a regular Monday.
“I'm not crazy about reality, but it's still the only place to get a decent meal.” —Groucho Marx
Go ahead, America, don’t be shy: bask in the glory of your impressive achievement.
Satisfied, America?
I so very much wish we didn't need this account of yours, Mr. @trumpsties.bsky.social sir. But I am so very, very, VERY grateful that you are around, since we desperately need you. Keep tying the good tie, kind sir.
Praise be…
He who controls the supposed “most powerful person in the world” is, in fact, the most powerful person in the world.
Sowing leads to reaping, and all that jazz…
Enjoy your Pivot-free August, @profgalloway.com.
As I’ve been saying nonstop for a long time now:
Enjoy!!!!!!!
Spot on.
PSYCH! #MildHorror
PSYCH! #MildHorror
“Can Trump, a man who's ignorant about so much, be trusted to make the correct and difficult decisions on AI without being unduly influenced by Big Tech, political contributors, or perhaps his own financial interests?” Short answer: No. Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
Sunday Bloody Sunday
As Captain Obvious once said: “Votes have consequences.”
Yup. America elected him, America got what it voted for.
Yup. Sadly, but very true.
Dear Nation: enjoy!
Trump’s first term was the only dark warning needed, and it was colossally disregarded. Everything that ensued, tarting with his re-election last November, is consequence of that most egregious of errors.
America, enjoy!
Enjoy!
Awesome shots. That last one is superb!
Sister Morphine, by The Rolling Stones
Such a strange, beautiful, complex mind.
“Describe a favorite movie in the most misleading way possible.” In a world where everyone has their quirks, this normie seeks the help of a zany foodie to chase down the most exclusive dress maker in town.
Sorry, didn’t mean to disgust/offend. Deleting. Have a great weekend.
The Sound of Noise
Ooh ooh, ooh ooh!
Don’t I know it? My son and I just missed it, due to a problem in the subway. Got stranded in a station for 50 minutes, gave up and came back home. The tickets are useless now, sadly.
Tiny Dancer, Elton John
