Once again, I will never understand Democrats decision not to make Peter Thiel and Curtis Yarvin into household names. These odious ghouls are extremely powerful and relatively unknown. Very few Americans would co-sign this inhumane moral degenerate.
This also goes back to the retreat from the ‘weird’ framing- so many people with massive governmental power are obvious creeps and weirdos that a normal person couldn’t stand to be in a room with
Who the fuck thinks that shit is intellectual?
Genuinely terrifying, because their ability to fly under the radar has given them massively undue influence in extraordinarily dangerous ways. Everyone should know what Thiel's Palantir is and does
📌
Is there anyone who would be opposed to seeing Yarvin publicly tortured?
Yes, I oppose public torture. There are other options.
Private torture?
There are so many options. But I am a simple man. #luigi
Same my friend. Same.
😆😆😆😆😆
I'd be happy with him forced to work customer service at Walmart until he died. All assets seized, he has to make do with what Wally World pays him.
I like that.
During Obama, everyone heard about Jeremiah Wright and Saul Alinsky. The GOP just fights disengenuously and differently and the media plays along.
Gaslight Obstruct Project G O P When facts or science hurts their feelings, lie, scream, shame and deny. Bart Simpson mentality: I didn't do it, you didn't see it, you can't prove it, and you're stupid and ugly too.
Lenny and Squiggy
It was the allure of the tech bros money. Dems thought they could use it so they spent far too long withholding critique of these people.
It's hardly possible to make even "Epstein", or "insurrection" (when we all saw it clearly) a household name in the US with all of the propaganda, let alone these behind the scenes techno-fascists.
Deeply gross and weird behavior, but also just incomprehensible, what is this alleged intellectual powerhouse even trying to say?
I believe many Americans would. I mean, they’re indifferent to genocide.
Dems have been profiting from trafficking data. It helps to hide the ones with the tea, so we can all keep pretending that one is the good party and one is bad. Only way it got this bad is with scaffolding. Decades and decades of imperializing the fed.
These malcontents are indeed most offensive and they just don't care anymore about shame which is bad for everyone because the only way this ends is someone dies - and it sure as fuck isn't going to be me!
Yarvin's RAGE versus Musk's DOGE got consistently repressed by the media in fascist ways that I will never fully understand.
not only is thiel's rasputin a gutter racist but he doesn't even understand what 'exception that proves the rule' means
The people that needed to hear it would have tuned it out. Fox News BECAME them. And what does “negrous” mean, other than a made-up slur? How pathetic and small these people are.
WTF
what does this even mean
He’s using an established slang term for nouveau-riche.
a Jim Crow racist slur used in lynchings, rapes of Black Ams.. descendants of slaves.. more like.. Not an "established slang term"..
How does its vileness make it “not an established slang term”?
It's a racial slur used to dehumanize, oppress, enslave a specific group of people. That's not "slang" and Yarvin a known eugenicist~is intentionally attempting to normalize the use of the n-word as "established slang" vs what it is. Hence the repetition/emphasis.Context: www.bbc.com/news/stories...
fyi~attempted to post a deeper analysis via NAACP (pushing for banning the word) but bluesky moderation justifiably censored the post ~bc the n-word was spelled out & "it" is not "established slang"... It's a word used within hate speech and hate crimes/violence towards a specific group.
here's the rest of yarvin's thread.. . racist rant bsky.app/profile/esqu...
ik there's an ad nauseam argument "well blacks call themselves n*...ga & that's diff than n*~'ger so it's slang that's morphed its etymology" but tbh my father who grew up in the JC south-witnessed lynchings~ never allowed it spoken in his presence, not even w/ BA using the slur (in a self-own)
Slurs are absolutely a type of slang, I’ve been an outspoken antiracist since the 1980s, and elsewhere in this thread I literally mused that it’d be nice if Yarvin got Luigied. You’ve chosen the wrong target and the wrong tactic. Please refine your strategy; this isn’t effective antiracist work.
no you've completely missed the point. and it wasn't a "tactic".. It is absolutely not "established slang" . research a bit more... the NAACP link is rlly helpful def think he's using the word to normalize it as "established" which is tied to eugenics/class elitism .. so you're right there
I don’t know where you get your definition of the word slang, but if you think it doesn’t include slurs, I don’t know what to tell you. “Informal nonstandard vocabulary” comes from Merriam-Webster, and slurs certainly fall under that umbrella as far as I’m concerned.
omg.. get the naacp link (from google) to understand context. not attempting to explain/educate you on this.. your mind is made up. was just sharing info over/out. a hui hou. ✌🏽
I know how slurs work, FFS. Where did you get this idea that “slang” is somehow sweet & innocent? “Informal nonstandard vocabulary” includes *most* pejoratives, including the most harmful hate speech. Slang is an umbrella term. Hate speech is *a form of speech*, so linguistic terms apply.
I don’t think we mean the same thing by “tactic,” either. If you’re doing political work, do it strategically and tactically, or else you’re likely to just get suckered into a harmless channel, or flail around and do more harm than good. Posting is a tactic. (An especially weak one.)
no.. you're complicating this and maybe unintentionally normalizing hate speech which is exactly the point of yarvin's eugenic rant. hate speech is NOT slang. the n-word is not slang. it's hate speech .. targeting a specific group. hope that helped. research a bit.. over/out
you’re getting tangled up in the word “established” but it is preexisting, not made up by that person clearly unacceptable, but i understood it even though i don’t know anyone who uses that word in any permutation around me
no not accurate.. it's a racial slur.. not "established slang" .. used in hate speech/ hate crimes..and it's banned /censored on many platforms including bsky. yarvin was using it not only to make a class distinction but also normalize his own eugenic modus
(He’s pro-aristocracy.)
Curtis Yarvin is a household name?
@jd-vance-1.bsky.social Isn't this your guru?
Particularly since they are so intertwined with JD Vance who the American people deeply love.
As an Ohioan, I'm here to report that rename-myself-for-fame Vance is cyborg "humane genocide" scum.