The strategy is voting for the best available option. To continue to push for better, even if the options are not good. (Though not the same.) The main problem is the people voting for the worse. But if this will improve, then, with this strategy, we would get eventually good option.
Eventually something good will happen, somehow, but in the meantime both sides are growing an agency full of sadistic monsters who can't wait for a chance to ruin people's lives. Liberal version of Thoughts & Prayers
no, the problem is assholes who accuse the people pushing for better of wanting free unicorns and telling them if they don't vote for genocide they're helping trump
If you didn't vote Kamala, you helped trump and more genocide.
you're a piece of shit who doesn't give a fuck about genocide
Wrong, that is why I actually take actions towards less of it.
exploiting it to use as a talking point to blame voters instead of the candidate who wanted to perpetuate it is not "taking actions towards less of it" you have a toxic fucking mindset where you can't see yourself as a bad person
What you partially helped: Resumed deliveries of heavy bombs (MK-84). Introduced restrictions on the International Criminal Court for warrant for Netanyahu. Approved arms exports to Israel worth a total of $12 billion, including bombs, missiles, precision-guided munitions, and armored bulldozers...