This is not terrorism
This is not terrorism
To be honest, this all feels like an obvious and entirely predictable response to the clampdown on protests over the past few years. Protest has been criminalised, so now protestors act like criminals.
Who exactly has Palestinian Action ‘terrorised’? The RAF? Does the RAF feel ‘terrorised’ by red paint? Because if they do what practical use are they to the UK?
FWIW I'd say successfully carrying out non-violent crimes against such a base is actually being a 'useful nuisance'. It indicates weaknesses that say, the Russian GRU might exploit. See also the way the Prison Service has publicised SAS troops being unable to escape high-security prisons for PR.
I don't think it's just this one incident, seems to be the new direction they've taken over the past year has crossed a line that they were under with the previous dramatic protest style www.theguardian.com/uk-news/arti...
I frankly don’t give a flying f*ck whether Palestinian Action has ‘crossed a line’ they’re a million miles from committing the heinous terrorist crimes the IDF have committed. Yet this government not only hasn’t proscribed the IDF a ‘terrorist’ group they’re arming them to carry out terrorist acts!
Thanks. I notice it claims "violence" and "weapons". By "violence", does it mean "sprays paint" and by weapons does it mean "spray can"? This is where we have trust issues. It's all too easy to make claims. I want to see specific and verifiable evidence-based claims. Not vague rhetoric.
Because there's a huge difference between a small group "armed" with red paint and bolt cutters vs the same group armed with actual weapons. Right now, we see the former, and yet hear claims that imply the latter.
Imagine it was this PA group in Bristol last August who ramraided Elbit Systems Ltd, an Israel-based international military technology company: www.theguardian.com/uk-news/arti...