🧵 THREAD: Why the Cato Institute’s new paper on “misinformation panic” is dangerously wrong, and why it completely misunderstands the real crisis we face. www.cato.org/policy-analy...
🧵 THREAD: Why the Cato Institute’s new paper on “misinformation panic” is dangerously wrong, and why it completely misunderstands the real crisis we face. www.cato.org/policy-analy...
Seems a foundational error to characterize it as a “misunderstanding.”
Well it is the Cato Institute.🤷🏽♂️
📌
How can you be a person who is alive and reach the conclusion that the absolute avalanche of scams and misinformation online is... fine actually? How??
I should have replied to this thread rather than quote posting... bsky.app/profile/aste...
Misunderstands? Or dis-understands?
Ask yourself, is what I am thinking about a verifiable fact or an opinion. If it's a fact, how directly related to you is it. If it is directly related to you give it high priority. If it is an opinion, is it your opinion or someone else's opinion.
They are eating the cats, they are eating the dogs.
The misinformation is all about controlling the information so people can't tell it's false information. Tech became overvalued because of fake accounts.
This article is not pointing out that AI, robots, and foreign and fake accounts are the biggest source of brainwashing propaganda misinformation. Because people's core belief system was created by using their imagination playing with toys people don't know they do not have control of their mind
@noupside.bsky.social
Yeah I’ve written the same response to the same libertarian arguments for years now. Here’s one from this week. Had a word count so it keeps the focus on response but: lawliberty.org/content-mode...
Great article, as usual. Thank you for sharing it.
📌
📌
Feels like this paper from Cato intentionally confuses the terms. This meme clears it all out😉👇
That’s the same difference as a liar versus someone who “misspoke”
Or how we have tried to sanitize "hungry children" with "food insecurity"...... Just more semantics to avoid reality..
I expected you would notice the "feels" too. bsky.app/profile/jpet...
tldr - "This 'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Tucker Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary'"
I’m sure the free market will solve this in some libertarian fantasy world.
Are they misunderstanding or taking part in spreading more misinformation? Just seems that at some point, we can stop giving organizations like Cato, and their employees, any benefit of the doubt.
And that point was 1977, when it was founded by Charles Koch.
The Cato paper is missing the information, that the US government itself became a main source of disinformation spreading.
Worth reading and forwarding. Thank you ! 🙏
There are no words. So now it’s the disinformation over misinformation…
In other news, rain is wet. We are talking about the Cato Institute. They’re known for being pompous morons.
It’s the Cato Institute. Do they misunderstand it, or do they deliberately misrepresent this crisis?
It may be filtered through their own assumptions and biases.
Maybe. Or maybe your assessment is too kind.
"The Misleading Panic over Misinformation" says Institute at the helm of misinformation
A truly excellent summary of your thinking, thanks a lot! I also really wonder how to spread this message, we are in desperate need of it being heard.
Subvert the “firehose of disinformation” by using similar tactics to disseminate truths.
📌
The Cato institute was created by the Koch brothers the undermine Democracy
Horrifying. I’m still having to walk folks thru the impact of mis and disinfo. The presumption being that there isn’t really much impact…
📌📌
@unroll.skywriter.blue
The thread as a shareable webpage: https://skywriter.blue/pages/did:plc:2whlowi5jjjqrdrrj4lxh2lx/post/3lsl2fpxyk22e.
@skyview.social Unroll please
Thanks for this clear thinking.
They deliberately put out misleading information. It’s their job unfortunately. So of course they try to obscure their own deliberate misinformation.
People care what the Cato has to say?
ALWAYS check your references…
@ducugavril.nafoforum.org 👀
@unroll.skywriter.blue unroll pls
The thread as a shareable webpage: https://skywriter.blue/pages/did:plc:2whlowi5jjjqrdrrj4lxh2lx/post/3lsl2fpxyk22e.
Deliberately wrong. They want fudge de definition so regulation is impossible.
Half the article explains how little we know and how complicated it is The first recommendation: Cancel all related research The second: Make it illegal for representatives to support related research A bias: so many free speech advocates are assholes that get joy from yelling people down
Their use of "jawboning" and not defining it marks their intended audience. (That was never in question really, but I think it's an interesting lapse for a piece intended to look like the view should be common.) I'd never heard it but a quick search seems to show a pretty large bias in usage
And Jim Jordan, Taibbi, Elon et al basically tried that, and there were real harms done, and when you’re at the mercy of funding, even their fucked-up, bumbling efforts hurt us.
“Propaganda” belongs in this discussion - when misinfo, disinfo and malinfo are harnessed together deliberately for a purpose. Successful propaganda has its own playbook: - Start with truth and distort it (malinfo) - Repeat outright disinfo claims relentlessly - Vilify alternative info sources
ALL of this - YES!
@visualglitch91.com
"The vision of the Cato Institute is a free and open society in which liberty allows every individual to pursue a life of prosperity and meaning in peace." cheirinho de ancap, já não deviam esperar nada de bom dai mesmo
Uhum, total esvaziamento
I don't know if they're still global warming denialists, but it's hilarious for them to warn of disinformation
Obviously a purveyor of misinformation is going to tell you not to worry about misinformation.
Obviously And Rupert Murdoch is still able to call his cable program Fox "News" without any disclaimer.
📌
📌
📌
”Misunderstands”
Our ability to make decisions hinges on accurately interpreting accurate information.
The guy who wrote it worked for Facebook for 4 years. The end.
📌
📌
📌
misinformation is how they make their money.
Not misinformation. They know they are lying. Disinformation.
Because the fucking CATO is probably full of #GrandOldPerverts who are terrified of the #kompromat #BRICS & #Trump’s #intelligenceservices gave on them “ … doesn’t exist anymore!” A Mob B Klan C Extortion D Vampires
Disinformers spreading disinformation about disinformation
Interesting side note about recent Cato happenings. They give an award every year "Milton Friedman Prize" to somebody who significantly "advances freedom". In 2025 The Cato Institute, which is funded by the Koch political machine, gave to award to Charles Koch. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cato_In....
📌
Great thread, 🙏
📌
Isn't CATO just part of a network of shady organizations and helpful in project 2025? The Background reads awful. (Sorry, this Database is in German language)
They detest what Trump is doing. Which doesn't mean they can't be helping Project2025. But I doubt it.
I saw one contribution, but i don't know if this list ist complete. I know that there is a dissent between different tastes of disaster capitalism.
I despised ChatGPT until I started using it - yesterday. It is amazing.
We’ve entered the Brunnerverse.
📌
Metamisinformation 🤯
It’s bad faith, not sincere misunderstanding.
📌
Cato Institute is a propaganda outlet, pure and simple.
Also the expression 'fact-checking' is a lie. Statements can be checked, facts cannot. Worse, fact-checkers are self-declared authorities. Science is opposed to lies and authorities. All statements in science can be doubted and checked. By everybody. Including you.
📌. 🔔😺EH🧵250627 ⚙️ ddex cato
They understand COMPLETELY- They ARE pouring it out now
Maybe the Cato Institute should have watched Dominic Cummings presentation about how he ran the brexit campaign www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ut2...
Cato? The people who misinformed the public about climate change? They're just like the people who insisted Russia wouldn't invade Ukraine so please don't prepare.
The Cato article is classic gaslighting, not surprising from a Koch founded and funded fascist organization.
Cato Institute, organization denying/downplaying climate change founded by one of Koch brothers, the oil billionaires? Well, no surprise they downplay the threat of misinformation, being one of actors spreading it.
Eliot, I find your threads / videos on disordered discourse+ v informative and thought-provoking. Please keep going 👍🏻👌🏻🙏🏻
Especially Gaza Palestine - russian UN misinformations
HOLY FUCK. 2 MASSIVELY WRONG statements, IN THE FIRST 2 bullet points!!!
Cato was set up to spread misinformation, it’s not surprising they hold this view.
The Cato Institute just published a long paper arguing that the panic around “misinformation” is overblown, politicised, and harmful to free speech. It’s slick, readable, and fundamentally misleading. Here’s why.
Of course the paper is “slick, readable and fundamentally misleading.” It is the Cato Institute after all.
Cato is kind of a suspect organization
I haven’t kept up with the Cato Institute in recent years but it wouldn’t surprise me if the author was a Straussian.
He's with the heritage foundation
If true, that is not mentioned in his bio. Regardless, his article comes across to me as run-of-the-mill libertarianism.
His name and picture are on their site. So what you thought is correct.
Because Cato published it?
One of the author’s main complaints is that no one agrees on what “misinformation” actually means. And he’s right, there is confusion. So let’s be precise.
There is confusion, but he provides tables with definitions that line up with each other pretty well. The confusion is when people use these terms casually.
Media scholar Clare Wardle and colleagues developed a helpful typology: Disinformation = false or misleading information spread deliberately to deceive or manipulate.
Like Western capitalist governments indulge in to justify their imperialist aggression?
Yes, and in my work I point to the parallel between the lose of public trust in institutions after WW1 propaganda and after the invasion of Iraq as key moments. Both moments required rebuilding public trust in foundational democratic ideals, but its not really happened post 2003
I mean the Iraq war and general response to 9/11 severed my connection with the liberal mainstream, drove me further to the left.
Plus we then had the financial crisis, and time and time again we saw the institutions we had trusted to perform the verification, deliberation and accountability functions fail to live up to expectations, or wildly violate those expectations.
And my argument is that neoliberalism also hollowed out our capacity to form effective democratic counterpublics to respond in an effective manner.
Is it Clare or Claire? vivo.brown.edu/display/cwar...
Gah, Claire, my mistake.
Misinformation = false or misleading information spread by people who believe it’s true. Malinformation = true information used in misleading or harmful ways.
What about 'flooding the zone with shit'? Where does that fit in?
It flattens verification and deliberation by not allowing room for either, ensuring no accountability.
These categories help us move beyond vague fears and look more clearly at the different forms that harmful information can take. But even this isn’t the full picture.
The real danger comes when this material forms disordered discourse, systems of belief that reinforce themselves, reject correction, and disconnect people from any shared standard of reality.
Not long after I read this thread I saw this post. The man's entire world is disordered. To the extent that he's forgotten that there is a reality he should be engaging with. bsky.app/profile/cweb...
aka "Conspiracism".
The Cato paper treats harmful information as just a few false claims floating around online. It says people rarely fall for it, the damage is minor, and the real problem is elite overreaction. This radically understates the scale and nature of the issue.
"The Cato Institute is an American libertarian think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C. It was founded in 1977 by Ed Crane, Murray Rothbard, and ***Charles Koch, chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Koch Industries***- wikipedia
You have got to see this presentation by Senator Whitehouse on how your electric bill will go up: www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cXa... Global warming and AI will raise your electric bill by >30%. Screw you, Chuck Koch!
i don't think Cato is a good source. "Not surprisingly, Murray’s anti-regulation manifesto is being giddily promoted by right-wing organizations like the American Enterprise Institute, Murray’s institutional home, as well as the CATO Institute..." www.peoplefor.org/rightwingwat...
“People rarely fall for it”
Surely elite fear of losing control of the narrative is what is at play here? Are you claiming only right wing populist lie?
Not at all, but you should think about how the elite controlled narratives through the 20th century, what structures existed to allow that and how thats changed in the last 15 years.
If you're not already familiar with his work, Walter Lippmann was a key thinker in this area, even if, as I do, you disagree with his proposed solution www.philosophizethis.org/podcast/dewe...
Isn't Cato tentatively a similar team and "elite' like the infamous heritage foundation?
How do they reconcile the reductions in vaccines because of false information? Dead people is pretty dangerous to me
Why would they write this? It is like the worst Facebook opinions in a paper
The danger isn’t just that people believe lies. It’s that entire communities become locked into belief systems that can’t be challenged, where loyalty replaces evidence, and disagreement feels like betrayal. That doesn’t just distort truth, it breaks trust.
I’m not sure you state clearly enough the origin of these lies. People in positions of trust—Trump, GOP, Fox—band together to create these lies, propagate them and “keep up the bit” no matter how absurd, leaving anyone foolish enough to trust them to believe it. THEN the tribalism compounds it.
Worry a lot about this. In political campaigns they have a “gettable” column of likely voters in the respective district. But I’ve seen anecdotal cases indicating how millions of people who WOULD be persuadable on the merits have been placed beyond the gettable column by these dynamics.
It means nothing less than the collapse of reason as the basis for organising society. And the centrality and elevation of reason is what makes democracies so successful and adaptable.
I see that with the war psychosis taking hold in the UK.
The corruption takes place on several levels, on a personal level misinfo undermines citizen's epistemic rights to develop themselves as human beings that can form opinions and evaluate choices. It removes our right to intelligence and uncorrupted cognitive decision-making.
Moving beyond the social part you named, it also blows the Marketplace of Ideas to pieces, destroying the very NeoLiberal premise that Cato operates on. The core of their theory is busted. Saying truth doesn't matter in the MoI is like saying money doesn't matter in financial markets.
Interestingly, that doesn't sound like a modern phenomenon - but I suppose the assumption had become that modern ways would automatically lead to better information?
When this happens at scale, it’s not just bad information, it’s a breakdown in how society makes decisions. We lose the ability to deliberate, to find common ground, to hold anyone accountable. That’s what disordered discourse really is, a collapse in collective reasoning.
📌
On social media quantity beats quality. With all the bots and trolls spinning around, you get a completely skewed view of the facts and the world.
Republicans have been about theater since Reagan. Gingrich started the nonsense speak. Now we have a reality television President with a cabinet cast from Fox News. Bombs are for ratings. Billionaires run things. The BBB is so sad.
And when debate collapses, power doesn’t disappear, it just becomes unaccountable. Truth becomes tribal. Institutions become hollow. People are left shouting across a void, each group certain the others are insane or evil. That’s not freedom, it’s fragmentation.
📌
LOL. The CATO Institute practically birthed “US disinformation”. Taking seriously any opinion they offer on that subject is the equivalent of drinking Jones’ cyanide laced koolaide!!
Yeah the original Phillip Morris tobacco boys www.thenation.com/article/arch... Independent and Principled? Behind the Cato Myth