That the public doesn't know who to trust? That includes you.

Read the thread carefully and come back to me if you want to discuss it seriously.

And please don't insult my intelligence by denying you exist in a competitive media landscape and GreyZone has the exact demographic target audience. If you want to discuss it seriously.

I read the thread and someone could easily make the same critique of Bellingcat. That's the point. If you want to discuss it seriously?

Okay, explain how they could make the same critique of Bellingcat?

foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/17/b...

Can you explain your claim and how that article supports it?

You have as much credibility as Blumenthal. Less actually. Stones and glass houses.

newrepublic.com/article/1619...

I want thinking, not linking, can you manage that? Or is it just vibes?

www.declassifieduk.org/cia-sidekick...

www.theguardian.com/world/2021/o...

Posting a bunch of links is not an arguement, you get that, right? You need to explain how they support a thesis that you specify.

Your credibility and 'independence' is highly debatable. As a matter of strict definition, the links demonstrate you are not. Does this help you. You're a hypocrite, too.

You actually have to explain and evidence that now. Glad to help explain how to have a discussion with you, but try to put effort in.

Oh please. euvsdisinfo.eu/report/belli...