You're pointing to selective outrage. That's valid. But inversionism is something deeper: a worldview where truth is determined not by verification, but by oppositional alignment. That's what my work is describing.
Replies
So let’s absolutely talk about who’s quiet now, and who’s defending the indefensible. But let’s not confuse that with the specific epistemic collapse that inversionism describes. The two problems are different, and both worth addressing.
aug 3, 2025, 4:22 pm • 40 0 • view