Hey real quick, seeing as you’re a student of the text: when does the constitution say the president is allowed take bribes?
Hey real quick, seeing as you’re a student of the text: when does the constitution say the president is allowed take bribes?
Since I know you’ll never admit the gaping chasm of your textual hypocrisy, enjoy this screenshot as a receipt of your rhetorical pratfall:
Learn what infringement means you misused it Thats the problem you can’t seem to understand The public education system failed you
That’s really interesting, thank you for your answer. When’s the president allowed to take bribes, constitutionally speaking?
I thick the Clintons set the precedent that taking bribes for pardons is acceptable behavior
So, because of the Clintons, it’s okay now for presidents to take bribes? I wasn’t aware they’d changed the constitution like that. Can you remind me how that happened?
Who claimed the constitution was changed? I said they set a precedent it was acceptable and they did.
So, right now, constitutionally speaking, is it legal for the current president to take bribes? Does it make a difference if the bribe comes from a foreigner? It’s so confusing.
Again you can use google I don’t tutor for free. Your ignorance is not my problem
Well, Google tells me the president is absolutely not allowed to take bribes under any circumstance. How does that square with the payments he’s been personally extracting from universities, law firms, the people who buy his crypto, the government of Vietnam, the government of Qatar, and Tim Apple?
Like with infringement you not understanding what the definition of bribe is is about 99% of your problem
You support the constitution, don’t you?