avatar
GalbinusCaeli @galbinuscaeli.bsky.social

I thought there was a total of around 600 children. Am I remembering that incorrectly?

sep 1, 2025, 3:58 pm • 15 0

Replies

avatar
Anna Bower @annabower.bsky.social

The number of kids on the planes is smaller than the number of kids in the putative class of people covered by the judge’s TRO

sep 1, 2025, 4:23 pm • 34 2 • view
avatar
Steve Portigal @steveportigal.bsky.social

The number of children in the class action versus the number of children on the plane(s) (I think)

sep 1, 2025, 4:19 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
GalbinusCaeli @galbinuscaeli.bsky.social

Right. So what is happening with the rest of the kids?

sep 1, 2025, 4:22 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Steve Portigal @steveportigal.bsky.social

this is not a researched or informed answer, but I presumed they were not at risk of like-tonight imminent deportation, but were added to the class so if the action prevails, they would all receive protection

sep 1, 2025, 4:25 pm • 9 3 • view
avatar
Anna Bower @annabower.bsky.social

Right

sep 1, 2025, 4:26 pm • 12 1 • view
avatar
GalbinusCaeli @galbinuscaeli.bsky.social

I give the current administration zero benefit of the doubt. I'd like to see this specifically spelled out.

sep 1, 2025, 4:27 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
teachpeacex3.bsky.social @teachpeacex3.bsky.social

No, heard that too...

sep 1, 2025, 4:01 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
GalbinusCaeli @galbinuscaeli.bsky.social

Here is a CNN report that gives the 600 number. Trump Admin Sending 600 Guatemalan Kids Back Home in New 'Repatriation' Move—Report - Newsweek share.google/R8Ko0xRcQCW3...

sep 1, 2025, 4:10 pm • 3 2 • view
avatar
GalbinusCaeli @galbinuscaeli.bsky.social

Our brilliant host M. Bowers says "hundreds" here: Emergency Hearing over the Removal of Unaccompanied Minors to Guatemala | Lawfare share.google/NaS2PKPI9WOm...

sep 1, 2025, 4:12 pm • 4 1 • view
avatar
GalbinusCaeli @galbinuscaeli.bsky.social

But the most recent updates only say 76. Of which 10 are named. Did the other 524 never exist? (Reporting was fast and loose). Or are they covered by implication?

sep 1, 2025, 4:14 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Leslie Talbot @leslietalbot.bsky.social

I think that there were a total of 600 that they wanted to deport, but a much smaller number involved with this particular action.

sep 1, 2025, 4:18 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
GalbinusCaeli @galbinuscaeli.bsky.social

Well, they want to deport anyone darker than ecru, but I get your point.

sep 1, 2025, 4:21 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Leslie Talbot @leslietalbot.bsky.social

Yeah, which is why I’m happy that class action covers all of the kids.

sep 1, 2025, 4:23 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
GalbinusCaeli @galbinuscaeli.bsky.social

Does it? (Please understand that I am not being intentionally argumentative) Can you give a reference? Everything I have seen lists the class as 76 children with 10 named.

sep 1, 2025, 4:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Leslie Talbot @leslietalbot.bsky.social

I could be wrong. I thought all 600 were protected, maybe not as part of the class but as part of her order.

sep 1, 2025, 4:26 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
GalbinusCaeli @galbinuscaeli.bsky.social

And our host M. Bowers has answered in the affirmative.

sep 1, 2025, 4:34 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Leslie Talbot @leslietalbot.bsky.social

Yes, I just saw that!

sep 1, 2025, 4:35 pm • 1 0 • view