if there was a willingness to end the conflict all the hostages would have been offered, they won't even return dead bodies freely, arguing he said she said about negotiations we are not privy to goes nowhere
if there was a willingness to end the conflict all the hostages would have been offered, they won't even return dead bodies freely, arguing he said she said about negotiations we are not privy to goes nowhere
"Offering all the hostages" isn't "negotiations", it's "offering all the hostages". Why are you using the word "negotiations" when it's not the word you mean?
the details of how they would surrender, safe passage, the return of hostages etc is negotiations
You don't use a generic word when you actually mean a very specific subset of the generic domain & exclude the whole rest of the domain. So that doesn't answer my question of why you say "negotiate" when you mean "returning the hostages" - let alone now you actually reveal you meant "surrender"
of course its surrender, its surrender because fighting does not help the people you say you want to help, its simple, and to do that and to insure the survival of your own forces you negotiate the particulars, its common sense, lost because its all about blaming not solving with most peo[ple
Might Israel kill half of Gaza's population if Hamas doesn't surrender?
why are pushing for Hamas to surrender if you believe this
I don't believe this, "Hamas surrendering is what will stop this" is your thing, I'm just trying to better understand what you believe.
they won't
Why do you think they won't? Don't countries "do what they think they have to do to win" or however it was you put it?