It's plausible to assume that without the aid, many people would've been much more miserable and more susceptible to recruitment by radicals. The decisive factor for recruitment is desperation, not free-time.
It's plausible to assume that without the aid, many people would've been much more miserable and more susceptible to recruitment by radicals. The decisive factor for recruitment is desperation, not free-time.
Would you say that that aid was a good investment?
I don't think humanitarian aid can be an investment to begin with, because it doesn't "yield" any capital.