specific, yes. I viewed it as "reply to pull out to stock attack # 68"
specific, yes. I viewed it as "reply to pull out to stock attack # 68"
I prefer "You're duplicitous and engaging in this despite knowing exactly the counter arguments to your claims and this is not a good faith exchange. Bye." The back and forth isn't useful to anybody involved.
(Though a book like that might be a useful reference for somebody questioning a Creationist upbringing....)
can't argue with that. :-)