In this case, the human writer is trying to claim he only uses AI for background. So, I guess he made up some of these himself 🥴
In this case, the human writer is trying to claim he only uses AI for background. So, I guess he made up some of these himself 🥴
Wait, that article was written by a human writer who was too lazy to do his own research?!?!? Damn, why can't they hire people with skills who take pride in their work? Was that writer somebody who got the job because of connections?
www.cbc.ca/news/world/c... ‘The list was generated by freelancer Marco Buscaglia, a Chicago-based writer, content strategist and teacher. He confirmed that he failed to fact check what he gleaned using AI’
He should not have used AI. I have no problem writing articles without it. The only reasons to use AI to write something for you is out of laziness or lack of writing talent.