Do we need to confuse and blur the line between men and women to elementary schools to read a book? Yeah, no. You do not processing information properly.
Do we need to confuse and blur the line between men and women to elementary schools to read a book? Yeah, no. You do not processing information properly.
And you do not grammaring properly, apparently. But you didn't answer my question: what's at all sexual about the image?
Kids looking at a mentally and sexually confused adult. Yafuckinmoron.
Nah, I'm pretty sure he knows who he is. If you see that image and see something sexual going on that's firmly a 'you' problem.
Again, you DO NOT PROCESS INFORMATION PROPERLY. Who the fuck cares what HE/SHE thinks. It’s the KIDS that DO NOT NEED TO CONTEND with a MENTAL LY DISEASED freak in elementary school.
He isn't mentally diseased, though. I think flying into a rage when you see a drag queen is far more diseased behavior, myself.
Again YOU ARE NOT PROCESSING INFORMATION PROPERLY. I don’t care of he wants to be a purple elephant. Im OK with it. WE ARE NOT SERVING IT TO MINORS IN SCHOOL, DOPE. 👎
No, I'm not processing it the way you want me to. These are different things. From that picture it looks like there are parents with the kids. Who are you to tell them how to raise their kids?
Again, BACKWARD LOGIC. Why is a publicly funded school promoting mental cases with sexual dysphoria to minors.
Because they aren't mental cases, or confused, and it behooves the entirety of society that people don't start frothing at the mouth when they see a drag queen. Like you seem to.
Not putting it up in front of kids. -for the retard in the back.