AI. Read it.

Are you saying that evidence presented outside the Grand Jury testimony would prove, or disprove a witness’s testimony?

I'm not saying that, no. I mean, it could, but it wouldn't necessarily be the case. It would depend on the nature of the evidence itself.

These witnesses do have proof. But none in the GJ testimony are stating Trump was inappropriate with minors. Why would Trump order that if it was pointing to him? MAGA has been DEMANDING exactly what you are for the past 4 years. 90% of our politicians have been videoed, and they’re fucked.

I mean, if AI is all you trust... Read it.

Agents are not first hand witnesses. These are opinions, and are swayed by a political bias. We are done with Lawfare. It’s been used to death on Trump. Game over on that play. The 9 years of Democrats having the power to do that is now over.

I guess reading comprehension not your strength, eh? The agents testimony IS the Grand jury testimony. That's all it consists of. None of the piles of gathered evidence and documentation, no witness testimony, just these 2 agents summaries of the evidence. That's all Trump wants you to see. Why?

I’m saying everything AFTER the Grand Jury testimony. Try and connect a dot or two.

🤣 Lol. No you aren't. You asserted Trump did release the files, with a pic showing he asked to release the Grand Jury testimony. Then you posted another pic claiming the Grand jury testimony is the most sensitive, secretive part of the case. Even highlighted it. Now you're saying it can't be trusted

What power does your party have? Zero. Why is that? Trust.

There were active volcanoes on the moon when dinosaurs were still around.

Lol. You guys are totally winning.

The human circulatory system is more than 60,000 miles long.

Supporting the mentally ill is prolly not viable any more.