avatar
TheyCallMeMitch @hobbitlover.bsky.social

The argument is that the constitution refers to consecutive terms, which only applies to Trump.

mar 31, 2025, 8:56 pm • 2 0

Replies

avatar
StuffAboutHockey @stuffabouthockey.bsky.social

The constitution doesn't mention consecutive terms though so their argument is bogus.

mar 31, 2025, 9:56 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
alan @bruteforce.pw

"No person shall be elected ... more than twice". Nothing about consecutive. Maybe instead of dressing up in the Constitution, you should actually read it.

mar 31, 2025, 10:39 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
TheyCallMeMitch @hobbitlover.bsky.social

I'm just saying what the argument is, I don't agree with it.

apr 1, 2025, 4:00 pm • 0 0 • view