The argument is that the constitution refers to consecutive terms, which only applies to Trump.
The argument is that the constitution refers to consecutive terms, which only applies to Trump.
The constitution doesn't mention consecutive terms though so their argument is bogus.
"No person shall be elected ... more than twice". Nothing about consecutive. Maybe instead of dressing up in the Constitution, you should actually read it.
I'm just saying what the argument is, I don't agree with it.