You'll recall the part where I said that the optics weren't great regardless of the rights and wrongs. Most people aren't in a position to juggle settings on two homes.

But where’s the juggling? She didn’t own two houses and the reason for that is she got divorced and transferred the property to her ex-husband as a result, presumably as part of the settlement as her children lived there. This happens all the time!

5yrs after the event, and just before the Hove purchase. That's what creates the story. Is it also normal in such cases that you still spend a lot of time in the house you lost as part of the divorce?

5 years after separating. I understand the divorce isn’t final yet. So nothing unusual in spending time in that house pending divorce particularly as her kids lived there. also nothing unusual in transferring ownership as part of a divorce settlement. In other news, water is wet!

So we're agreed the right wing press will jump on the tiniest thing to stir the pot? Once again I'm suggesting the optics aren't ideal and in general political figures need to work harder to avoid these situations. We've seen it all before.