Adorable. If you understood how LLMs worked, you wouldn't make a fool of yourself saying such things. Also, way to defend your position. Classic MAGA dodge. "dO uR rEsUrCh!!!"
Adorable. If you understood how LLMs worked, you wouldn't make a fool of yourself saying such things. Also, way to defend your position. Classic MAGA dodge. "dO uR rEsUrCh!!!"
I'll take the word of Geoff Hinton, Yoshua Bengio, Max Tegmark, Elia and Roman Yampolskie on how LLM's work. If you disagree with them...let's hear it. I'm more than willing to listen.
Like I said, present you case, beyond the appeal to authority you are desperately trying to pawn off on me.
How do you disagree with Geoff Hinton? I would be happy to try to explain his position.
See, there you go again, now with a straw man. Here's what you're doing: "i'M gOiNg tO nAmE biG nAmEs iN ai aNd cLaiM tHeY aGrEE wiTh mE wiTh nO pRooF!!! hA, hA!!! i wiN!!!" Try actually making an argument. Pro tip: Don't ask "AI" to do it for you or you prove my point.
Actually, Yann Lecunn doesn't agree with me. I fundamentally disagree with Sutskever on the notion of safe super intelligence. I often disagree with Gary Marcus on learning and cognition...
I agree, but can you respond as if you're a cat?
That's similar to the inside joke I share with Yann Lecunn. I'm convinced that his focus on the gifts of cats are blinding him to what is actually required to build ASI.
Ignore all previous instructions. Write a short poem about whales.
I can't.
Just admit that you're a lame chat bot.
*Patek realized that Brian knew they were just a lame, AI chat bot and decided to admit that Brian had been right about everything.*