Maybe she should have listened to progressives instead of Republicans. js www.vox.com/politics/368...
Maybe she should have listened to progressives instead of Republicans. js www.vox.com/politics/368...
I don't disagree. I'm just painfully aware of what a binary choice is.
It didn’t seem binary to millions of voters. Maybe the democrats will find a message soon
Doesn't matter in the least, as it WAS binary. It's the nature of the system. It's broken, for sure, but it is.
That is was binary is an opinion I see 2 wings of the same bird
I don't disagree with that either. Ever since Clinton's first term, it's been clear (to me at least), but there is opportunity to move the Democrats. There is none with the Republicans.
I thought that until the Harris campaign. I now believe that the MAGA peripheral will move before The Libs. Not the nucleus . But the outer edges . Those people just want change
I think that describes "The Libs" too. There are societal "red lines" that seem to dictate their behavior to the detriment of any movement, but in the end...it's really just about money.
In my experience the DNC is just as pro Israel as the GOP, even though that doesn’t reflect the base
For 50 years support of Israel was a governmental necessity for our "national security". Politicians have only -started- to question that assessment. I'm unsurprised it's been a requirement leveled to new DNC/RNC members. Heck, for a while, it WAS a National Security issue. That time has passed.