Remember when Fox News flipped out about that girl that said “One nation under Allah?” You sound like Fox News right now. Maybe all these phrases should only be condemned when the context is that they are against Jews as a group rather that Israel as a group.
Socrates thought it vital that terms be carefully defined before engaging in (philosophical) discussion or debate. A large amount of shouting and screaming in discussion of the Mideast and of the Palestinian genocide occurs because many have different understandings of the meaning of who...
... is a "Jew" or "Israeli" or "Zionist". So it is best not to make use of these references at all. Instead we define a term "religious terrorist" who in one particular aspect has a despicable and disturbed belief that his god through his holy book permits him to claim and to steal by acts...
... of murder the land of another, and dispossess the victims of what is rightfully theirs. Netanyahu and those like him are these religious terrorists, criminals who must be brought to justice in whatever form that is. We need not allow Netanyahu drape around himself...
... the cloak of being a "Jew", "Israeli" or "Zionist", since others claiming that identity might strenuously object that Netanyahu is a member of the class to which they belong.
Also it seems like there is something getting lost in this discussion — the substantial role of the Christian Zionists, especially the Christofascists at Heritage Foundation. They literally wrote the book on squashing dissent for Palestine (Project Esther) and, more notoriously, Project 2025 (cont)
2/2 Everything is connected. Israel, with America’s help, used Palestine as a “Laboratory”. Gaza could be considered the origin of a global uprising against all oppression. In that regard, Globalize the Intifada sounds right.
