Yes, because the initial post, which you chose to respond to, is attempting to prove this point. So thanks for living up to the stereotype of annoying online leftist guy lol
Yes, because the initial post, which you chose to respond to, is attempting to prove this point. So thanks for living up to the stereotype of annoying online leftist guy lol
Another projection. You are the one who chose to engage ignorantly with a socialist, and when people who are socialist try to educate you in response you call them "annoying leftist" and refuse to look at yourself in the mirror for your sheer level of ignorant engagement to begin with...
I'm a socialist! I am not a communist. Again, missing the whole point of the post, congratulations
If you are a socialist, then DEFINE it why don't you. How can i understand where you are coming from if you refuse to define your so-called "understanding" of Socialism?
I believe basically the same as Bernie Sanders, that we can improve the current system by increasing taxes on the wealthy and using that money to help people in need, while also more closely regulating the treatment of workers. I do not believe private property should be abolished which is communism
In what way is taxation different from having the military take money and promising they'll give it back to us? Pinky promise on using it to help people in need? bsky.app/profile/nath...
Capitalism in its relentless quest for profits will always attack and roll back such reforms. The global nature of imperialism makes such a reformist program inapplicable to the majority of the world. The wheels of class struggle drive toward crisis and revolution no matter what. Sorry
That's Social Democracy, not Socialism. Socialism advocates for a democratic economy under public ownership, social democracy advocates for significant reforms within capitalism, resembling the nordic model. These reforms are not only far from sufficient, but are reversible by capitalist politics.