no just saying that basically we’ll have to advance retirement age proportionally as we increase lifespan.

In the strange hypothetical where people just didn’t age, you could imagine all sorts of retirement-like schemes: 10 years off for 40 years in, work every other year, don’t retire at all but have a 20-hour work week, w/e

That seems like a fair tradeoff? If you're healthy and active until 120, no reason we couldn't bump up the retirement age too.

man I don’t want to work to 105 or whatever.

I don't want to die at 80!

working to 60, having a secure retirement for 20 years, and then rapidly dying at 80… doesn’t sound so bad!

well I mean, in terms of how we abolish aging and senescence.