I mean, why not 212 Democrats?
Replies
Right?!?!
jul 30, 2025, 5:54 pm β’ 3 0 β’ view
It's never enough. Why not celebrate the fact that it's being done instead of find a reason to criticize?
jul 31, 2025, 1:01 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
Because Iβm allowed to criticize elected βleadersβ for doing the bare minimum while our democracy teeters on the edge of collapse.π
jul 31, 2025, 3:01 pm β’ 0 0 β’ view
And I'm allowed to criticize you for whining about the good instead of opposing the bad. ππ½
jul 31, 2025, 3:03 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
And I donβt give a single fuck about your opinion. Now, run along.
jul 31, 2025, 4:53 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
π€£ Then when bother responding? This is what you do if you dgaf. I'll demonstrate. π π
jul 31, 2025, 5:17 pm β’ 1 0 β’ view
Itβs the oversite committee most likely
jul 30, 2025, 6:00 pm β’ 7 0 β’ view
Two possibilities that don't passively aggressively drag Democrats could be that, the 12 were from the oversight committee, or the 12 we those actually denied entry to perform oversight giving them standing. The article didn't say.
jul 31, 2025, 5:33 pm β’ 0 0 β’ view