3/ I previously wrote this: medium.com/@notashley/j... There are far too many way the metadata can lose meaning that the so-called expert cannot account for. He cannot claim to have made any genuine effort to replicate this.
Replies
4/ As a member of the chartered institute for computing (we caution against misuse of expert evidence after the Post Office scandal), I am bound by professional ethics. I can state unequivocally that Jim Borwick is not a member of our profession. And should not be allowed to give evidence.
sep 1, 2025, 10:19 pm • 23 2 • view
Given that he has and it may influence the tribunal, what are potential recourses?
sep 1, 2025, 10:27 pm • 1 0 • view
My instinct is that the panel (one judge and two CIPD members) would simply dismiss or disregard these conspiracy theory-like side issues. If this goes awry, the only recourse would be an appeal.
sep 1, 2025, 10:32 pm • 5 0 • view
Thanks! I expect there will be an appeal whatever the outcome.
sep 1, 2025, 10:34 pm • 1 0 • view
Recent history suggests institutions do not appeal in matters of trans rights
sep 1, 2025, 10:37 pm • 5 0 • view
True. I suppose it depends what the tribunal actually finds. If it just finds that there was a procedural error, may be less likely to appeal. If it rules about sexual harassment or the like, an appeal seems more probable.
sep 2, 2025, 6:22 am • 1 0 • view
5/ I do not practice law in the UK, so in this case I can only comment on matters strictly within my own profession. Whether barristers and hate groups conspired to interfere with the administration of justice is not my concern and remains a question for further investigation.
sep 1, 2025, 10:28 pm • 20 3 • view
I seem to recall in one case I was involved in the Judge asked for someone from the Register of Experts. Would/should one of those have not been called here?
sep 1, 2025, 11:04 pm • 4 0 • view