avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

Can we stop to talk about how remarkable the timing was? Compliant at 1am, Judge engaged at 2am, ex parte call to the Government at 2:30am (they did not answer), TRO at 4am? On a Sunday of a holiday weekend?!

aug 31, 2025, 7:53 pm • 882 135

Replies

avatar
RuledByStars @ruledbystars.bsky.social

That's judicial action by a real judge. WOW...

aug 31, 2025, 8:58 pm • 46 6 • view
avatar
humuhumu.bsky.social @humuhumu.bsky.social

📌

aug 31, 2025, 11:35 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Jeffo @jcmedia65.bsky.social

Good to know some small part of our system is still trying to stop this shit show of a circus. 🎪

aug 31, 2025, 9:10 pm • 93 2 • view
avatar
sundevil.1984 @sundevil-1984.bsky.social

bsky.app/profile/sund...

aug 31, 2025, 10:25 pm • 11 3 • view
avatar
fraublooms.bsky.social @fraublooms.bsky.social

Pop

aug 31, 2025, 9:01 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Jake V @viraldonutz.bsky.social

Goes the weasel

sep 1, 2025, 2:25 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
K Carlin @kcarlin25.bsky.social

@schnorkles.bsky.social - this admin has used up all their goodwill in cases of immigration - esp deportation of CHILDREN as young as 10

aug 31, 2025, 9:34 pm • 33 2 • view
avatar
Alice in the Land @aliceintheland.bsky.social

What happens if the child stealers don't comply? Who will hold them accountable?

aug 31, 2025, 9:52 pm • 16 4 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

Given that they (probably) turned around a plane in the air this morning, I don't think functional noncompliance is a real issue here. As for administrative noncompliance, a likely explanation remains that DOJ did not receive the first posthearing order (because no appearance was filed).

aug 31, 2025, 10:01 pm • 18 0 • view
avatar
curiosity-666.bsky.social @curiosity-666.bsky.social

You don't know what they did. Their history is to lie to the court so I suspect they did not turn anything around.

aug 31, 2025, 11:59 pm • 8 0 • view
avatar
Orange Expat @orangeexpat.bsky.social

Also the amount of hours it’s taken them to get these kids back would indicate you may be correct.

sep 1, 2025, 2:04 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Ruth keady @ruviewer.bsky.social

I’d be surprised if they were lying about this. They tell a certain kind of lie all the time - we misunderstood your order, it wasn’t in writing so didn’t count, we have no jurisdiction over that… they don’t usually lie about easily proven facts.

sep 1, 2025, 2:13 am • 6 0 • view
avatar
curiosity-666.bsky.social @curiosity-666.bsky.social

They lied to Judge Boasberg in the DC D.C. as to whether the plane to Venezuela was beyond US jurisdiction. That's why he held a hearing just last week on whether to hold the gov't in contempt of court.

sep 1, 2025, 2:21 am • 7 0 • view
avatar
Ruth keady @ruviewer.bsky.social

While looking up this older case I discovered that the US may now be at war with Venezuela

sep 1, 2025, 2:39 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Ruth keady @ruviewer.bsky.social

Isn’t this the same case where the government lawyers said the order should have been in writing?

sep 1, 2025, 2:34 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

Pronouns are tricky here. Today's case, L.G.M.L. v. Noem was filed at 1:02am TODAY, Aug. 31, and is (now) before Judge Sooknanan. That is not the same as J.G.G., the case before Judge Boasberg, that is the subject of contempt proceedings now stayed by the en banc DC Circuit. So: No. [fixed typo]

sep 1, 2025, 2:38 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Ruth keady @ruviewer.bsky.social

This just in: bsky.app/profile/josh...

sep 1, 2025, 2:46 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
dream-king.bsky.social @dream-king.bsky.social

That’s too generous based on their clear and obvious track record.

sep 1, 2025, 1:15 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Matunos @matunos.bsky.social

they underestimate the diligence of the opposition

sep 1, 2025, 8:32 am • 6 0 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

Also: Anyone on here with access to the Mailings menu in ecf.dcd (cgi-bin/MailNoticeRpt.pl)? Do we know if Drew Ensign is signed up to receive notice of the 4pm status report deadline that was just missed, given that he has not filed an appearance?

image
aug 31, 2025, 8:02 pm • 158 16 • view
avatar
Bob511 @bob511.bsky.social

"Because Defendants had not yet entered an appearance, they had not received notice of this Court’s order requiring a status report by 4:00pm and thus were not aware of it." Oops

aug 31, 2025, 10:31 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Angry Leshy @americanleshy.bsky.social

Can we stop to ask why the pedophile regime is moving unaccompanied children around in the middle of the night?

aug 31, 2025, 11:25 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

1 hour later...no 4pm status report. Doesn't anyone with a filing account have that menu?

aug 31, 2025, 9:02 pm • 104 13 • view
avatar
milkweed.bsky.social @milkweed.bsky.social

Starting to get a bad feeling about this.

aug 31, 2025, 9:21 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
helchose.bsky.social @helchose.bsky.social

They're ignoring the court order, aren't they.

aug 31, 2025, 9:34 pm • 5 1 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

At least one judge is taking deadline compliance seriously.

image
aug 31, 2025, 9:23 pm • 169 23 • view
avatar
Piotr Wilkin @ilintar.org

I guess she's read the J.G.G vs Trump case file VERY CAREFULLY. Also, I'm quite sure Judge Boasberg is waiting on that en banc rehearing to add the government's behavior in this case to his list of exhibits.

aug 31, 2025, 9:31 pm • 11 0 • view
avatar
Katiesaurus @katiesaurusseven.bsky.social

With alt text

U.S. District Court District of Columbia Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 8/31/2025 at 5:19 PM and filed on 8/31/2025 Case Name: L.G.M.L et al Case Number: 1:25-cv-02942 Filer: Document Number: No document attached Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER: The Court ordered the Defendants to file a status report by August 31, 2025, at 4:00 PM. They have not done so. The Court ORDERS the Defendants to show cause why a status report was not filed by that deadline. The Defendants remain under their obligation to file a status report addressing the current status of the deplaning of putative class members. If all class members have not been deplaned and moved back to the custody of ORR, the Defendants should advise when they expect that to occur. The Court further ORDERS the Plaintiffs to file a status report by August 31, 2025, at 6:30 PM, that addresses their understanding of whether the putative class members have been deplaned and moved to ORR. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 8/31/2025. (Icak) Reply Reply... Forwa... Θ
aug 31, 2025, 9:26 pm • 54 4 • view
avatar
John P Dougherty (JD) @jdcshaverford.bsky.social

TY

aug 31, 2025, 10:18 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
Kitty WH 🚺 @kittywashere.bsky.social

I had to look her up, since I’m not familiar with all the various judges, but there is good in this world and good in immigration, which has given us Judge Sooknanan!

aug 31, 2025, 9:28 pm • 16 0 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

Normally it's not worth commenting on notices of appearances, but…today it is. Drew Ensign files his appearance in the case at 6:20pm, so he will definitely receive notices going forward and can be presumed to have read the docket and prior orders by now.

image
aug 31, 2025, 10:21 pm • 29 1 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

Well, apparently they claim to have not received notice of the order due to non-appearance. I wonder how things will change in the future.

image
aug 31, 2025, 10:29 pm • 22 1 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

It's maybe worth noting this is not the first time Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew C. Ensign's failure to enter a formal appearance in a case has drawn attention. In the D.V.D. litigation before Judge Murphy (D. Mass), plaintiffs objected to his arguing w/o appearing. No dodged orders, tho.

aug 31, 2025, 10:37 pm • 35 3 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

Ooops? At 5:19pm Sunday, Judge Sooknanan, in the midst of all this with the Government's status reports, ordered Plaintiffs to file a status report by 6:30pm Sunday. I missed that, and it appears the Plaintiffs might have, too, because they didn't. Sooknanan Monday at 12:07pm wants to know why:

… … … he Court further ORDERS the Plaintiffs to file a status report by August 31, 2025, at 6:30 PM, that addresses their understanding of whether the putative class members have been deplaned and moved to ORR. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 8/31/2025. (lcak)  Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER: The Court ordered the Plaintiffs to file a status report by August 31, 2025, at 6:30 PM. They have not done so. The Court ORDERS the Plaintiffs to show cause why a status report was not filed by that deadline. The Plaintiffs remain under their obligation to file a status report addressing their understanding of whether the putative class members have been deplaned and returned to ORR. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 9/1/2025. (lcak)
sep 1, 2025, 4:48 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
John Hawkinson @johnhawkinson.bsky.social

Like me, Plaintiffs didn't read Judge Sooknanan's order carefully, they say ("overlooked"). Plaintiffs now do not disagree with the Government's assessment that "all putative class members transported from ORR facilities have been deplaned and returned to ORR custody."

image image
sep 1, 2025, 9:40 pm • 5 1 • view
avatar
Chief Joe @chiefjoer.bsky.social

If there’s never any penalty he can do whatever the f he wants.

sep 1, 2025, 4:57 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Chief Joe @chiefjoer.bsky.social

Every day another excuse Every day another feeble judge who lets them get away with it.

sep 1, 2025, 4:57 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Chief Joe @chiefjoer.bsky.social

Judges are like bad parents. 1. Do this by 4 or you’ll be in big trouble! 2. Why didn’t you do this mister? 3. You better come up with a bs excuse! 4. Ok. But you better do it by tomorrow or you’re in BIG trouble No wonder no one is scared of them.

sep 1, 2025, 4:56 am • 3 0 • view