Also not being argumentative to you, just seems a trifle of a detail to try to hang someone on.
Also not being argumentative to you, just seems a trifle of a detail to try to hang someone on.
Understood. It can be a hazy area of underwriting. But so long as the borrower is honest and up front about the matter the underwriting decision precludes any claim of fraud
Correct. There has to be intent to commit fraud.
Strictly speaking, an intent to deceive
And there it is- clarity and transparency are key (in all things honestly). I get the feeling obfuscation and fraud weren’t the objective she was going for.
It is. We would never go after someone based on what she's been accused of.
Also- love the name. I do a great Charlie in the Box 😁 it’s saaaanta it’s saaanta
Thank you :)
Good, coz I guess I’m a criminal if so. Just run me for a gop position.