Not that they hadn’t tried, though. When the book came out, many of the bigshot AI researchers accused Weizenbaum of sour grapes on account of no longer being able to contribute anything original as a scientist.
Not that they hadn’t tried, though. When the book came out, many of the bigshot AI researchers accused Weizenbaum of sour grapes on account of no longer being able to contribute anything original as a scientist.
Well, they would…
Do you mean Minsky?
Yes, among others. It’s described in some detail in Pamela McCorduck’s _Machines Who Think_.
I think of Minsky as the Kurzweil of his time, always claiming the current AI was doing way more than it actually was doing, or en route to doing more than it ever would
and he was a child molester
Yeahhh that too
To be fair, his Society of Mind framework was fairly sophisticated. But he did have a bit of a fanatic’s zeal in him.