Look up what presidents do & what Congress does. It's revealing that NONE of the Obama-bashers EVER blame Rcons for blocking every single thing he tried to accomplish. I'm suspicious of EVERYONE who looks at the coordinated organized white supremacist opposition he faced and blames Obama for it!
Again, he's the president of the United States. Liberals forever throw their hands up and mutter that there was nothing they could do, whereas you know that if the roles were reversed and McConnel were a Democrat, he would have been imprisoned and a national strike called. Obama did nothing.
Nothing about your comment makes sense. If conservatives proposed legislation good for the country (something that has never happened) why would liberals block it? Dems HAVE blocked R legislation & nominees without being imprisoned. The very idea of Rcons calling a national strike is laughable.
Not sure what legislation has to do with anything, I am referring to Garland's nomination being blocked by McConnel. The Dems had the perfect opportunity to counter with Barrett but rolled over with barely a squeak.
<< The Dems had the perfect opportunity to counter with Barrett>> If you are a human being, you need to check your talking points. If you want an answer I'll answer you, but if you'd rather spare yourself the embarrassment and delete your comment I'll give you a chance to do that first.
What are you on about?
Think it through. How could the Dems have "countered with Barrett"?