No. Capitalism in the basic sense is free trade. Two individuals making an agreement to buy and sell some good or service. There’s nothing evil about that, nor is it morally suspect.
No. Capitalism in the basic sense is free trade. Two individuals making an agreement to buy and sell some good or service. There’s nothing evil about that, nor is it morally suspect.
Nor is it realistic.
But you cannot refute the facts.
"We let men take wealth which is not theirs; if the seizure is 'legal' we call it high profits and the profiteers help decide what is legal." - W.E.B. DuBois
So you have nothing of substance?
Not really true. Regulation was considered necessary by Adam Smith. "Free Market" is a different thing that some have combined with Capitalism.
Do you have an issue with individuals making a deal? Or should the nanny state watch over them, provided there isn’t any compulsion by either party? And if so, why?
People make deals all the time. That in itself is not "Free Market".
If it’s voluntary it is. Prove otherwise. Connect the dots, Einstein.
Individual transactions are just a subset. There is more to Free Markets than that.