avatar
galaxydreams70.bsky.social @galaxydreams70.bsky.social

No. Capitalism in the basic sense is free trade. Two individuals making an agreement to buy and sell some good or service. There’s nothing evil about that, nor is it morally suspect.

mar 28, 2025, 9:18 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Redstretchlimo @redstretchlimo.bsky.social

Nor is it realistic.

mar 28, 2025, 10:36 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
galaxydreams70.bsky.social @galaxydreams70.bsky.social

But you cannot refute the facts.

mar 28, 2025, 10:38 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Redstretchlimo @redstretchlimo.bsky.social

"We let men take wealth which is not theirs; if the seizure is 'legal' we call it high profits and the profiteers help decide what is legal." - W.E.B. DuBois

mar 28, 2025, 10:41 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
galaxydreams70.bsky.social @galaxydreams70.bsky.social

So you have nothing of substance?

mar 28, 2025, 11:44 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
sandorski.bsky.social @sandorski.bsky.social

Not really true. Regulation was considered necessary by Adam Smith. "Free Market" is a different thing that some have combined with Capitalism.

mar 28, 2025, 11:26 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
galaxydreams70.bsky.social @galaxydreams70.bsky.social

Do you have an issue with individuals making a deal? Or should the nanny state watch over them, provided there isn’t any compulsion by either party? And if so, why?

mar 28, 2025, 11:46 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
sandorski.bsky.social @sandorski.bsky.social

People make deals all the time. That in itself is not "Free Market".

mar 29, 2025, 1:34 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
galaxydreams70.bsky.social @galaxydreams70.bsky.social

If it’s voluntary it is. Prove otherwise. Connect the dots, Einstein.

mar 29, 2025, 1:36 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
sandorski.bsky.social @sandorski.bsky.social

Individual transactions are just a subset. There is more to Free Markets than that.

mar 29, 2025, 2:45 am • 0 0 • view