
I suppose you could argue that this isn't conclusive evidence that Hitler in this analogy is *central* to that person's views, but has OP asserted Yarvin was likewise *central* to Vance's views?
I suppose you could argue that this isn't conclusive evidence that Hitler in this analogy is *central* to that person's views, but has OP asserted Yarvin was likewise *central* to Vance's views?
Further, even if Yarvin is not *central* to Vance's views, the fact that Vance has both horrifying political beliefs and also cited Yarvin as an inspiration for those views is strong evidence of how terrible Vance is