I don't see bots and humans as equivalent at all (not even close). I was challenging the previous post's concept of what is useful and what is not useful. The point was that a tool doesn't have to be 100% correct to be useful as long as the user is aware of its limitations.
AI isn’t useful enough to justify all the havoc it’s causing is the fucking point
It's helping in the science fields. It's being used for image analysis, simulations and modeling, and for filtering data.
That’s certainly the PR spin. In the meantime it’s eroding truth, history, art, the environment, human intelligence, etc. Sorry but we’re not in a context where it’s few maybe beneficial use cases matter and I honestly see it as bad faith to bring them up in the face of all the harm it does
I don't mean to make light of what you said but when I read this I though for a moment you were talking about our current government. "In the meantime it’s eroding truth, history, art, the environment, human intelligence, etc."
Well yeah there’s a reason this government is all in on AI