avatar
Wesley Evans @wesleyevans.bsky.social

There is that point that Title 4 defines "Doctrine" as what's contained in the Book of Common Prayer! So other texts can be in line with but don't define our doctrine in the same way.

aug 28, 2025, 11:10 pm • 1 0

Replies

avatar
James @jgallyer.bsky.social

Definitely, and I'm not saying those that use EOW are necessarily out of line doctrinally (although there are definitely a few eyebrow raising things in EOW), but I do think some choices of EOW reflect a different theology than the BCP. E.g., even something small like avoiding using the word "Lord"

aug 28, 2025, 11:30 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
James @jgallyer.bsky.social

And I think the question becomes, can we truly say we are a church that prays in common if the approved liturgies can't fit in a single book? If you could, in theory, have two Episcopal churches that never use the same Eucharistic prayer, even if they use 3-4 throughout the year?

aug 28, 2025, 11:30 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
James @jgallyer.bsky.social

I do think the reactions against the 1979 were out of line, but I do think some of their fears have come to pass. We've gone from common prayer meaning having a BCP with 1 or two eps prayers, to a BCP with two whole different rites, to where we are now: some arguing common prayer means the shape!

aug 28, 2025, 11:30 pm • 2 0 • view