There's dozens of them. You want someone in 300 characters to go through what 10 characters a thing? His lawyer got felony convictions, his white house lawyers were breaking crimes, he involved himself with mafia providers, he takes illegal tax breaks for incomes under 80k in New York. Trump = Crime
What about when Liz Cheney was telling witnesses to change their story to make Trump look bad? Are you going to justify that?
Final thoughts. If this actually did happen to where Liz Cheney was interfering with official business in order to change an outcome and you want to lock her up? Go the ahead. That would explain why Harris lost against Trump by gallivanting with Liz Cheney. Liz Cheney objectively hurt her chances.
This is due to the fact that Obama got 7% of the moderate Republican support, Clinton got 6%, Harris got 5%, the whole point of going around with Liz was to garner more support from moderate Republicans which obviously didn't happen. She lost almost everyone's support. So I guess tell Liz "Thank You
I don't even see where she was even telling her to change her story. From what to what exactly? I don't know this is all just extra bullshit. If you can't get him on any of the 100 crimes he did commit, adding some sprinkles isn't going to suddenly make something that's not selling sell out.
That doesn't even make sense. 1. Why would anyone trust Liz Cheney. 2. Why do you need to make Trump look bad. The man is the avatar of bad. 3. Has any of that actually been verified within a huge degree of certainty? Where's the source? Who is the source? 4. Why does 2 fake sins make up for 100real