Isn't there some survivorship bias here? The Blue Dogs all represent 50/50 or even lean-red districts. If they are in Congress they are over-performers by definition.
Isn't there some survivorship bias here? The Blue Dogs all represent 50/50 or even lean-red districts. If they are in Congress they are over-performers by definition.
Only some. To wit: why can't the Squad over-perform? Why are there no progressives representing Trump districts?
I think this is a big issue. Obviously ppl in close districts that *win* are going to be overperformers. Also candidates in swing districts are way more likely to self identify in a moderate caucus. Don’t see how you can draw actionable takeaways from this.
The Squad wins and they aren't over-performers. Where are the progressive over-performers in purple districts who ID with the Squad? What's stopping them? (Other than the general election electorate obviously...viz, Kara Eastman)
Your data convinces me that ppl in close districts that win over perform the national ticket (obvious) and are more likely to self-identify as moderate. What else are you concluding?
I'm also concluding that the electoral strategy used by the Squad does not win net votes (_maybe_ more base votes, but fewer swing votes) and thus is a poor electoral strategy for use by purple-state candidates.
Ok thanks, I appreciate the thoughtful engagement. I’d be interested to see data to this effect. I don’t think this methodology allows for a causal assessment like that.
The anecdata (eg, Eastman, Gill, McCleod-Skinner) also indicate that progressives perform poorly in swing districts -- but would love more systematic data there.
all due respect your original post compared blue dogs to the squad - but just showed that ppl winning in close districts (by definition) outperform. Now you are asking a different question: would the squad perform better by moderating? Also interesting, but not what you originally looked at.
And the original post included the Blue Collar coalition -- don't sleep on them! I think it's interesting that candidates who glom onto Blue Collar/worker/econ issues over-perform in their run-of-the-mill districts.
Yes. Interesting but could just be correlation, which is not what yglesias is suggesting.