avatar
jonesybear.bsky.social @jonesybear.bsky.social

‘Elite Institutions’!? You confuse the whole sector of 2600 diverse, mostly small local day schools with a tiny number of elite public boarding schools and hate them because of it. The dictionary definition of bigotry.

aug 31, 2025, 2:15 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Phil @phil1.bsky.social

Read again… I’m not referring to the schools themselves as uniformly elite, I’m talking about institutions of society (parliament, business, the judiciary, etc) which at the elite level are composed wildly disproportionately of people from a privately educated background.

aug 31, 2025, 2:22 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
jonesybear.bsky.social @jonesybear.bsky.social

Still wrong. At best based the education landscape in the 70/80s not now and even then still from a limited number of elite boarding schools. There are some incredible state schools around which are only accessible through exams and buying an expensive house. They actually cost the state money.

aug 31, 2025, 3:38 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Phil @phil1.bsky.social

Sorry, what are you suggesting is “still wrong”? It’s an objective, empirical fact that Britain’s elite draws disproportionately from the privately educated. Data from 2019 (which a few years ago obviously but not quite the 70s or 80s): www.theguardian.com/society/2019...

image
aug 31, 2025, 3:50 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
jonesybear.bsky.social @jonesybear.bsky.social

And when were the elite judiciary educated?

aug 31, 2025, 4:11 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Phil @phil1.bsky.social

Hahaha hope those goalposts aren’t too heavy! We are talking about a pattern, not isolated cases. Even if senior judges are relatively older, the broader pattern across politics, media, and civil service remains intact: private school backgrounds give an advantage. That’s why parents pay for them!

aug 31, 2025, 4:19 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
jonesybear.bsky.social @jonesybear.bsky.social

Not really over state grammars. Maybe it’s selective schools or parents invested in their kids’ education. Oxbridge offer ratio of interviews to places insane for state and PS.

aug 31, 2025, 5:10 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Phil @phil1.bsky.social

State grammar schools also should not exist (and barely do), but I wonder if you have any data at all to back up the idea that private schools confer no greater advantage than grammar schools do? Or if you can offer any sort of justification for why kids with affluent parents should be advantages?

aug 31, 2025, 5:14 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
jonesybear.bsky.social @jonesybear.bsky.social

That should have said the same. Do you propose banning the reading of books to children and the use of tutors or taking kids on holiday or educational trips? Can’t be buying an advantage after all. Same with houses in good catchments.

aug 31, 2025, 5:29 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Phil @phil1.bsky.social

Can you please make a serious attempt to answer the questions I asked?

aug 31, 2025, 5:35 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
jonesybear.bsky.social @jonesybear.bsky.social

PS parent does not equal affluent (see data from UCL below) so taxing them doesn’t fix anything. How and why do you propose we stop parents trying to do the best for their kids with the resources they have, state or private, tutors, books, trips?

image
sep 1, 2025, 5:51 am • 0 0 • view