and the 99% are also white heterosexual "Christian" males.
and the 99% are also white heterosexual "Christian" males.
He's the same guy who pretended to be a black woman, right down to cartoonish attempts to "talk black" but forgot to log out of his main and into his sock account.
Well that’s just demeaning.
It’s just like magats going online pretending to be Dems.
No way🤦🏽! Wow! There is no low they’ll stoop to.
There's no such thing as cis, as people aren't a subset of people. So your chart needs work.
Then why do you have a name, if people aren't a subset of people? Cis means "same side of," nothing more. Look, either you're going to have to grow up and accept that the world doesn't conform to your ignorance, or you can fade from relevance. Frankly, it's not my chart that needs work.
If you take out the mass shootings that are gang related the number amongst the general population goes way way down
Damn lies and statistics. But the percentage of people who are transgender is very small. Around 1%. Even using these highly suspected inflated numbers of 4,193 with an expanded definition of what a mass shooting is. The percentages of mass shooters that are trans or not are about the same
Using these numbers, the percentage of mass shooters who are transgender is much lower than their percentage of the population. But let’s say the numbers are inflated and 1% of mass shooters are transgender. Now it’s proportional, and it’s almost like transgender people are just like everyone else…
Now consider the type of"mass shooting" we are talking about. Not transgender gangbangers in inner city Chicago. The transgender shooters are shooting strangers, children sometimes. If you had to
Eliminate that type of mass shooting from the statistics and just include general population where somebody sits in the clock Tower... These percentages are much different
So the thing about these statistics is that it all depends on how you define a mass shooting. Some agencies define it by the number of wounded, some the number dead, and some involved when the shooting started. But as long as both numbers come from the same dataset - then it's a valid comparison.