avatar
STEMthebleeding @stemthebleeding.bsky.social

For the visual learners, I made this chart. 4197 mass shootings since 2018 4 transgender = 0.095 percent 4193 cisgender = 99.905 percent

image
aug 31, 2025, 12:54 pm • 27 5

Replies

avatar
Jane Feldman @jtfdenver.bsky.social

and the 99% are also white heterosexual "Christian" males.

aug 31, 2025, 2:58 pm • 9 1 • view
avatar
AlexJChambers @alexjchambers.bsky.social

And look at this shit

image
aug 31, 2025, 3:05 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
VagabondVisions @vagabondvisions.bsky.social

He's the same guy who pretended to be a black woman, right down to cartoonish attempts to "talk black" but forgot to log out of his main and into his sock account.

image
aug 31, 2025, 3:21 pm • 10 0 • view
avatar
Cooler Heads Prevail @coolerheadsprevail.bsky.social

Well that’s just demeaning.

aug 31, 2025, 3:32 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
AlexJChambers @alexjchambers.bsky.social

It’s just like magats going online pretending to be Dems.

aug 31, 2025, 3:36 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
AlexJChambers @alexjchambers.bsky.social

No way🤦🏽! Wow! There is no low they’ll stoop to.

aug 31, 2025, 3:31 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Nod64, back again. @mr-nod-64.bsky.social

There's no such thing as cis, as people aren't a subset of people. So your chart needs work.

aug 31, 2025, 5:09 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
STEMthebleeding @stemthebleeding.bsky.social

Then why do you have a name, if people aren't a subset of people? Cis means "same side of," nothing more. Look, either you're going to have to grow up and accept that the world doesn't conform to your ignorance, or you can fade from relevance. Frankly, it's not my chart that needs work.

aug 31, 2025, 5:32 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
What's a Display Name @hartg12.bsky.social

If you take out the mass shootings that are gang related the number amongst the general population goes way way down

aug 31, 2025, 3:22 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
What's a Display Name @hartg12.bsky.social

Damn lies and statistics. But the percentage of people who are transgender is very small. Around 1%. Even using these highly suspected inflated numbers of 4,193 with an expanded definition of what a mass shooting is. The percentages of mass shooters that are trans or not are about the same

aug 31, 2025, 3:21 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Some guy @pug-dude.bsky.social

Using these numbers, the percentage of mass shooters who are transgender is much lower than their percentage of the population. But let’s say the numbers are inflated and 1% of mass shooters are transgender. Now it’s proportional, and it’s almost like transgender people are just like everyone else…

aug 31, 2025, 11:26 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
What's a Display Name @hartg12.bsky.social

Now consider the type of"mass shooting" we are talking about. Not transgender gangbangers in inner city Chicago. The transgender shooters are shooting strangers, children sometimes. If you had to

sep 1, 2025, 2:44 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
What's a Display Name @hartg12.bsky.social

Eliminate that type of mass shooting from the statistics and just include general population where somebody sits in the clock Tower... These percentages are much different

sep 1, 2025, 2:44 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
STEMthebleeding @stemthebleeding.bsky.social

So the thing about these statistics is that it all depends on how you define a mass shooting. Some agencies define it by the number of wounded, some the number dead, and some involved when the shooting started. But as long as both numbers come from the same dataset - then it's a valid comparison.

aug 31, 2025, 3:49 pm • 0 0 • view