sure, you can *try* to debate anything and everything, but not everything is up for debate, nor should some things be up for "debate" no one is yelling at you. also, nice "transmisogyny" moderation label, you've got there, btw. you really earned that one.

Yeah, I'm on a lot of lists, whoopty ding dong. I see a lot of anti-fascist Democrats on those lists too. It's pretty easy to get on them, all you have to do is question a trans person on pretty much anything and voila, you're on lists. Usually it boils down to me saying vote Dem in the general.

probably because all those "anti-fascist Democrats" that you deem to be "anti-fascist" are only "anti-fascist" when it comes to opposing Trump, and then they're not actually anti-fascist at all when it comes to opposing those who, oh, idk, agree with fascists on their podcasts. you don't "question"

Yeah, they probably don't see Newsom as a fascist. Opposing Trump, the architect of our current fascist state, is pretty important when it comes to earning the anti-fascist label. I think that podcast was a really bad idea, and this current approach is a fantastic one.

Newsom's "current approach" is being a fascist sympathizer who is adopting the same, fascist aesthetics that Trump is using in hopes of boosting his own popularity and image. it is bad. bsky.app/profile/b3an...

Newsom is already fear-mongering about trans people who transition under the age of 26 while he also openly agrees with far-right, anti-LGBTQ+ bigotry here. my quoted reply here is a reply to a recent clip of Newsom on a podcast: bsky.app/profile/b3an...

He is employing the aesthetics as satire. Very effective satire that is driving Republicans crazy.

tell that to Newsom defenders. they're eating it up, as intended.

Its a game for two players idiot. Dems also worked to implment fascist policy before Trump. Dems planned to betray us the working class long before Trump. www.aclu.org/press-releas...

Well then congrazs fucko. The only "allies" you have now are literal fascists because you wanted to debate trans existance.

Trans existence? When did I debate that?

What do you think repeating nazi arguments is intended for? Do you honestly belive the Nazi isn't a liar, and so they do have "reasonable concerns" about trans people in sports under biological essentialist pseudoscience that argues for their eradication?

You keep coming back to this claim, yet you have multiple times characterized everyone you're arguing with as calling you a Nazi just for disagreeing. Tell me, have you ever heard the word "hypocrite"?

Oh no, not everyone. Just the ones doing it.

That would be...nobody.

Ill call them a Nazi and a fascist. There is no doubt in my mind with ALL the doubling down they have done. There is no plausable deniability in my mind.

"them"

Yeah but you're not calling him a nazi just for disagreeing. It's not like he said a tv show you like was bad and you shouted "Nazi". His "disagreement" takes the form of having literal nazi opinions, defending bigots, and using fascist rhetoric (which, ironically, downplaying why people are...

Precisely. But I felt this distinction needed to be stated plainly.

...accusing him of fascism is an example of).