The difference is rittenhouse murdered someone who hadn’t murdered anyone else. Luigi murdered someone who explicitly used social murder for shareholder profit.
The difference is rittenhouse murdered someone who hadn’t murdered anyone else. Luigi murdered someone who explicitly used social murder for shareholder profit.
So how does that justify murder? How?
I’m not saying it justifies murder, I’m saying there is a great difference in who was murdered. One person was protesting social injustice while the other was the leader of an organization who cause death, suffering and bankruptcies for thousands of people in the name of corporate profit.
I don't know if I had been paying insrance for years and then they let my wife or one of my kids die I would be pretty devastated resentful and full of hatred because those I trusted and paid let me down
I understand fully as i had a nursing career, but that kind of action does nothing... Got find ways to create a movement to make changes
And if that fails, you’d better be prepared to escalate. Revolutionary France is an object lesson for all activists.
Who did Rittenhouse shoot that wasn’t actively attacking him first if he murdered anyone?