Is it blatant favoritism if its existence is proscribed in the party bylaws, and those bylaws predate the endorsements? The rules were in no way changed mid-stream here. They are being followed, as they would be if the same process endorsed Frey!
Is it blatant favoritism if its existence is proscribed in the party bylaws, and those bylaws predate the endorsements? The rules were in no way changed mid-stream here. They are being followed, as they would be if the same process endorsed Frey!
this shit isn't happening in a vacuum!
an endorsement was issued and Frey, not Davis, had it overturned how do you not understand how bad that looks?