The article says: "The law does not apply to federally mandated care, such as emergency services. It also ensures that providers cannot face legal or professional consequences for exercising this right and includes whistleblower protections."

I'm not defending this doctor, just pointing out what the article reports.

It’s a huge tell

Thanks for the clarification. Ever notice shitty legislation comes with built in barriers to protect the shitty legislation from ever being changed or questioned or challenged?

I understand. It’s sad , unconstitutional and sadistic. Also I’m pretty sure that a medical review board isn’t bound and has nothing to do with whistleblowing. The board could be held liable by third parties for damages. It’s a legal mess