@aoc.bsky.social I may have some ideas of companies into which taxpayers have invested that the next president could theoretically demand a cut.
@aoc.bsky.social I may have some ideas of companies into which taxpayers have invested that the next president could theoretically demand a cut.
One begins with a Tes and ends with a la.
knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/podcast/know... Wharton study says it was the right call. The loans were repaid, but US lost money when it sold the stock.
There’s the oil and gas companies that receive subsidies, how about Tesla? Just for starters.
I think. I believe. These are not words of assurance. These are words of capitulation and complicity.
Absolutely not it’s illegal
I seem to remember "too big to fail" being a thing a few years ago
I WAS BORN AND RAISED IN THE DISTRICT MIKE LAWLER REPRESENTS, THIS GUY IS AS PHONY AS A 3 DOLLAR BILL!!! A TOTAL FAILURE BY ROCKLAND COUNTY VOTERS!!! LAWLER IS SELLING YOU OUT!!! DO YOUR HOMEWORK!!! DO BETTER, VOTE SMARTER!!!
So Socialism over Capitalism. Is this a Marxist idea.
seemingly...do they even hear themselves
Unless Democrats get off their ass there will be no “next president”.
Could the "investment" be considered as a different form of taxation?