They’ve got a private stock to pump, you can hardly rely on them to make things like “accurate public statements about their technical capabilities”

Is that how you justified snake oil salesmen's pitches too & defended the quality of their snake oil before the brief window of time the FDA & FTC existed?

lol, you simp for Elon by arguing that “full self driving” and “autopilot” didn’t that the car could drive itself, don’t you? Such a weird, weird thing to be a cuck for companies committing blatant fraud.

I don't think you're very familiar with my body of work if you think I'm a simp for Elon

What’s the difference? You are very literally defending OpenAI committing outright fraud, acknowledging that it can’t do what it says but still going to the mat for it. It’s the exact same thing.

I don't think a general comment about the capabilities of LLMs followed by an obviously sarcastic remark about the fact that Sam Altcoin is a pump artist extraordinaire constitute "literally defending OpenAI"

Is your defense of this nonsense that...we should assume securities fraud as a baseline?

I always assume securities fraud as a baseline, it's kind of in the job description?

Got it. So users are stupid rubes for not realizing the internal workings of LLMs, and Silicon Valley guys are all criminals. Savvy!

Tech's complicated, but we're not all villains.

yeah you are, sorry