You support Newsom because he wants to "gerrymander back" at the GOP, but you still preach the efficacy of the vote? Maybe you aren't convincing anyone because you don't seem to have a consistent stance.
Replies
Here’s a thought. Terrorizing millions of people with a threat to suicide bomb American Democracy if they dare to nominate Gavin Newsom isn’t a very persuasive strategy and might be turning people off or against you.
aug 31, 2025, 8:21 pm • 0 0 • view
We’re seeing it in France already. The dipshit left is aligning with the fascist right to oppose budget cuts because France is going bankrupt. They’d rather the fascists take over than have to work 37 hours a week.
aug 31, 2025, 8:19 pm • 0 0 • view
I don’t support Newsom. I’m supporting Pritzker. But I don’t want the dumbass left to carry out their threat to suicide bomb American democracy in the next few elections if they don’t get what they want.
aug 31, 2025, 8:17 pm • 0 0 • view
Instead of "the Democrats refuse to listen to the overwhelming direction of their own base", you say things like "suicide bomb American democracy" when people demand reciprocity for their vote. That's how it's *supposed* to work in an alleged democracy, you feckless bootlicker.
aug 31, 2025, 8:25 pm • 0 0 • view
Guess what? Then the so called “base” can just nominate someone else then? Why make threats if you have the voting power?
aug 31, 2025, 8:27 pm • 0 0 • view
Explain how expecting your elected representative to represent you is a threat? Feels like you keep saying untrue things like they are facts to support your spurious position.
aug 31, 2025, 8:29 pm • 0 0 • view
You keep making up arguments I’m not making to rebut. Go ahead and demand that the nominee represent you. But if it’s not the one you want, you still should vote for them because it is better than the alternative by leaps abd bounds.
aug 31, 2025, 8:31 pm • 0 0 • view