Heritage has now created something Project 2025-like for Article II and Article III. Conspicuously absent is anything addressing Article I. What conclusions would draw from that? Because I draw a lot of them.
Replies
This has the stank of fundamentalist religion alllllllll over it.
sep 10, 2025, 2:58 pm • 2 0 • view
sep 10, 2025, 8:08 pm • 1 0 • view
Where does the article say that the book won’t cover Article I? I don’t see that, and I haven’t seen a TOC for the book.
sep 10, 2025, 10:52 pm • 1 0 • view
The audience for the report is the judiciary is what I mean. Or at least that is who meant to use it. Yes, it technically includes Article I, though.
sep 10, 2025, 11:06 pm • 1 0 • view
Ohhhhhh, yeah, totally right. Heritage decided that billionaire-funded rightwing legal scholarship in law reviews was too inefficient.
sep 10, 2025, 11:13 pm • 2 0 • view
First, we safely tell conservatives to fuck off whenever they sanctimoniously dry hump Article I. Second, that reinforces my belief that progressives need to build an Article I agenda for building/sustaining power. cc @beaubaumann.bsky.social
sep 10, 2025, 2:40 pm • 10 0 • view
Totally desperately needed
sep 10, 2025, 3:08 pm • 3 0 • view